Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Sociol Rev. 2014 Nov 5;79(6):1088–1121. doi: 10.1177/0003122414554001

Table A2.

Correlation Table of Estimates Revealing Covariance Patterns Exist

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Edges 1.000 −.627 −.289 −.507 −.581 −.359 −.270 −.564 −.060 .112
Network Mechanisms
2. Mutuality −.627 1.000 .340 .364 .582 .160 .044 .146 .046 −.149
3. GWESP −.289 .340 1.000 .459 .501 .217 −.263 −.057 .273 −.093
4. Hierarchy −.507 .364 .459 1.000 .367 .198 .317 .306 .208 .111
5. Club Ties −.581 .582 .501 .367 1.000 .202 −.108 .026 .088 −.112
Homophily
6. Race Homophily −.359 .160 .217 .198 .202 1.000 .123 −.224 .074 −.287
7. Gender Homophily −.270 .044 −.263 .317 −.108 .123 1.000 .229 −.115 .141
8. Age Homophily −.564 .146 −.057 .306 .026 −.224 .229 1.000 −.062 .124
9. GPA Difference −.060 .046 .273 .208 .088 .074 −.115 −.062 1.000 .158
10. SES Difference .112 −.149 −.093 .111 −.112 −.287 .141 .124 .158 1.000

Findings: Network variables are correlated, indicating the need for more complex covariance structures.