Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 22;35(2):437–450. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01046-14

TABLE 3.

Transcription factors from both of the databases JASPAR and TRANSFAC

Serial no. Rank Matrix no. Name of position-specific matrix in databasesa P valueb Sequencec
1 1 M01549 F$CUP9_01 0.00742 TCCTCAATGTGTCAATTAAC
2 MA0288.1 CUP9 0.00791 AATGTGTCA
2 3 M01030 F$RIM101_01 0.0176 CCAAGCTA
3 4 M01621 F$SOK2_01 0.0278 GCCTGCAACT
5 MA0385.1 SOK2 0.0329 TATATGCATGCG
4 6 MA0350.1 TOD6 0.0341 ATTTTTCCCTCATCGGCACAT
5 7 M01523 F$PHD1_01 0.0343 ATGCTTATATGCATGCGCATA
6 8 M01534 F$TEC1_01 0.0345 TTGCCAAAATTCTTGCTTTC
7 9 M01537 F$DOT6_01 0.0355 ATTTTTCCCTCATCGGCACAT
10 MA0351.1 DOT6 0.0363 ATTTTTCCCTCATCGGCACAT
8 11 MA0398.1 SUM1 0.0424 TTAATTTAT
a

Names beginning with “F” are from the TRANSFAC database; all other names are from the JASPAR database.

b

Probability of observing a certain or higher affinity in a given sequence. An accurate P value computation for the TRAP tool scores allows determination of which factors are the most likely to regulate a given target gene. It is set to normalize an observed affinity for a random-sequence model and to give a statistical meaning to the statement that one factor binds stronger than another.

c

Sequence of the transcription factor binding site.