Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 2;8:124. doi: 10.1186/s12918-014-0124-0

Table 3.

Model checking statistical analysis results for the phase variation case study

id % true #total STML #true STML #false STML Exec. times
PBLSTL μ σ μ σ μ σ μ σ
1 100 67.95 12.51 67.12 11.52 0.83 0.98 0:2.87 0:0.57
2 100 103.21 57.70 0.81 1.18 102.40 56.56 0:4.40 0:2.60
3 100 63.05 8.43 62.62 7.74 0.43 0.69 0:2.75 0:0.43
4 99.6 3.29 12.79 1.84 7.51 1.45 5.36 0:0.22 0:0.83
5 74.6 15.35 14.17 6.98 5.94 8.36 8.72 0:0.99 0:0.92
6 99.8 982.63 111.18 10.74 1.62 971.88 109.59 0:43.71 0:9.70
7 100 106.21 42.53 102.53 39.42 3.68 3.11 0:4.67 0:2.02
8 99.8 30.04 63.24 24.87 51.40 5.17 11.99 0:1.33 0:2.59

Entries in the “id” column represent the numeric identifiers placed at the right of each PBLSTL statement. The “% true PBLSTL” column describes what percentage of the 500 executions concluded that the PBLSTL statement is true. “#total STML” represents the total number of STML files evaluated for the PBLSTL statement; columns “#true STML” and “#false STML” represent the number of STML files for which the PBLSTL statement was evaluated true, respectively false.“ μ” and “ σ” represent the mean and standard deviation. “Exec. times” presents the average model checking execution time for each PBLSTL evaluation using the “minutes:seconds” format.