Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Hepatol. 2014 Sep 6;62(1):190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.08.036

Figure 2. Mean change in liver fat assessed by computer-assisted image morphometry of liver biopsy tissue.

Figure 2

Figure 2

(A) 95% confidence intervals for the mean pre to post-intervention change in Image-Liver-Fat, evaluated at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd quartiles of the pre to post-intervention change in body weight (kg) distribution. This figure demonstrates that N-3 intervention led to strong trends in improvement in liver fat by histological image analysis than placebo at the lowest 2 quartiles of weight change.

(B) Mean difference in pre to post-intervention change in Image-Liver-fat, between N-3 and placebo evaluated at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, quartiles of the pre to post-intervention change in body weight distribution. This figure shows that N-3 intervention led to similar change in Steatosis by image analysis regardless of weight change.