Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 11;81(1):2–8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01862-14

TABLE 2.

Reductions in numbers of viable Escherichia coli O157:H7 cells on ham slice surfaces treated with UV, NIR, and NIR-UV

Treatment time (s) Log reduction (log10 n0 − log10 n) by treatment type and selective mediuma
UV (SMAC) NIR (SMAC) NIR-UV
SMAC SPRAB
0 0.00 ± 0.00A 0.00 ± 0.00A 0.00 ± 0.00Aa 0.00 ± 0.00Aa
10 1.22 ± 0.27B 0.06 ± 0.07A 1.57 ± 0.33Ba 1.49 ± 0.01Ba
20 1.24 ± 0.26B 0.11 ± 0.07A 1.88 ± 0.24BCa 1.54 ± 0.02Ba
30 1.29 ± 0.22B 0.21 ± 0.11A 2.00 ± 0.38BCDa 1.62 ± 0.08BCa
40 1.43 ± 0.23B 0.25 ± 0.11A 2.14 ± 0.30CDa 1.81 ± 0.34BCa
50 1.46 ± 0.21B 0.69 ± 0.27B 2.46 ± 0.19DEa 1.96 ± 0.25Ca
60 1.50 ± 0.24B 1.05 ± 0.23C 2.68 ± 0.16Ea 2.46 ± 0.30Da
70b 1.52 ± 0.15B 1.46 ± 0.09D 3.62 ± 0.26Fa 3.23 ± 0.23Ea
a

The values are means ± standard deviations from three replications. Means with the same uppercase letter in the same column are not significantly different (P > 0.05). Within the NIR-UV columns, values in the same row followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05). SMAC, sorbitol MacConkey agar; SPRAB, phenol red agar base with 1% sorbitol; n0, initial population; n, population after treatment.

b

A statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference between the sum of NIR and UV inactivation and inactivation achieved with combination treatment was observed.