Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Nov 26;0:75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.11.010

Table 2.

Characteristics of PEP exposures and regimens by event-level crystal methamphetamine use (N=84) compared to no crystal methamphetamine use (N=1,046) and by chronic crystal methamphetamine use compared to no chronic methamphetamine use

Crystal Meth Use at Time of Exposure No Crystal Meth Use P-value Documented Crystal Meth Use Disorder1 No Crystal Meth Use Disorder P-value Overall
Reason for NPEP access
Unprotected anal sex 68 (81.0%) 569 (54.4%) <0.001 110 (74.3%) 527 (53.7%) <0.001 637 (56.4%)
Unprotected oral sex 3 (3.6%) 74 (7.1%) 0.27 3 (2.0%) 74 (7.5%) 0.008 77 (6.8%)
Condom failure 7 (8.3%) 344 (32.9%) <0.001 25 (16.9%) 326 (33.2%) <0.001 351 (31.1%)
Rape 3 (3.6%) 31 (3.0%) 0.74 5 (3.4%) 29 (3.0%) 0.80 34 (3.0%)
Needle Sharing 5 (6.0%) 2 (0.2%) <0.001 4 (2.7%) 3 (0.3%) 0.007 7 (0.6%)
HIV status of partner
Known infected – on treatment 8 (9.5%) 143 (13.7%) 20 (13.5%) 131 (13.3%) 151 (13.4%)
Known infected – not on treatment 2 (2.4%) 44 (4.2%) <0.001 1 (0.7%) 45 (4.6%) <0.001 46 (4.1%)
Known infected – unknown treatment 32 (38.1%) 173 (16.5%) 51 (34.5%) 154 (15.7%) 205 (18.1%)
Unknown status 42 (50.0%) 686 (65.6%) 76 (51.4%) 652 (66.4%) 728 (64.4%)
Tenofovir-based treatment regimen 70 (84.3%) 796 (77.3%) 0.17 120 (82.8%) 746 (77.1%) 0.13 866 (77.8%)
Three-drug regimen 59 (70.2%) 476 (45.5%) <0.001 97 (65.5%) 438 (44.6%) <0.001 535 (47.4%)
1

Individuals could have had more than one NPEP visits; numbers do not add up to 58 (total number of individuals with a documented crystal methamphetamine use disorder)