Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 7;5:2036–2047. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.5.212

Table 2.

Parameters describing the adsorption of HSA and chemically modified HSA onto NPs with different surface coatings.

NP/surface charge RH (nm) Protein ΔRH (nm) KD (µM) n

Cysteamine–QD + 6.3 ± 0.4 HSA 4.4 ± 0.4 0.025 ± 0.007 1.5 ± 0.4
DPA–QD 6.1 ± 0.1 HSA 2.8 ± 0.2 0.31 ± 0.06 1.0 ± 0.2
QD ITK 585 9.3 ± 0.2 HSA 3.2 ± 0.7 24.8 ± 3.8 0.8 ± 0.1
QD ITK 585a 7.9 ± 0.3 HSA 3.2 ± 0.4 37 ± 12 0.8 ± 0.2
Polymer–Fe–Pta 5.6 ± 0.2 HSA 3.3 ± 0.3 5.1 ± 1.3 0.7 ± 0.1
Polymer–Fe–Ptb 6.0 ± 0.1 HSA 3.3 ± 0.3 9.9 ± 4.7 0.9 ± 0.2
DHLA–QDc 4.8 ± 0.2 HSA 3.2 ± 0.8 6 ± 3 0.7 ± 0.1
DHLA–QDc 4.8 ± 0.2 HSAsuc 8.1 ± 0.6 19 ± 8 0.5 ± 0.1
DHLA–QDc 5.6 ± 0.1 HSAam 4.0 ± 0.1 0.022 ± 0.003 1.2 ± 0.1
DHLA–Aud 2.9 ± 0.1 HSA nd 0.08 ± 0.02 0.8 ± 0.1
DHLA–Aud 4.0 ± 0.4 HSAsuc nd 1.2 ± 0.4 0.7 ± 0.1
DHLA–Aud 3.5 ± 0.2 HSAam nd 0.034 ± 0.008 0.7 ± 0.1
DHLA–Age 1.1 ± 0.2 HSA nd 0.37 ± 0.02 nd

Data taken from a [45], b [46], c [22], d [49] and e [32]. nd = not determined.