Table 4.
Models and variables | Coefficient | t-stat | P-value | 95% confidence interval | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women attending first ANC visit (Segmented regression) | |||||
Comparison clusters | β 0 : Intercept | 124.3333*** | 4.42 | 0.000 | (65.50, 183.17) |
β 1 : Secular (time) trend | 0.4145 | 0.06 | 0.955 | (−14.69, 15.52) | |
β 2a : Supply effect on level | 48.7914 | 1.83 | 0.083 | (−7.07, 104.65) | |
β3a : Supply effect on trend | 4.8908 | 0.66 | 0.515 | (−10.54, 20.32) | |
CCT clusters | β 0 : Intercept | 129.5687*** | 4.74 | 0.000 | (71.88, 187.254) |
β 1 : Secular (time) trend | 7.5109 | 1.07 | 0.300 | (−7.30, 22.32) | |
β 2a : Supply effect on level | −12.0445 | −0.41 | 0.685 | (−73.71, 49.62) | |
β 3a : Supply effect on trend | 0.0031 | 0.00 | 1.000 | (−16.30, 16.31) | |
β 2b : CCT effect on level | 59.2698 | 1.96 | 0.067 | (−4.52, 123.06) | |
β 3b : CCT effect on trend | −8.3150 | −1.29 | 0.213 | (−21.87, 5.24) | |
Women attending at least 4 ANC visits (Prais-Winston regression) | |||||
Comparison clusters | β 0 : Intercept | 103.5899*** | 6.06 | 0.000 | (67.83, 139.35) |
β 1 : Secular (time) trend | −0.2366 | −0.06 | 0.951 | (−8.26, 7.79) | |
β 2a : Supply effect on level | 4.5210 | 0.36 | 0.726 | (−22.08, 31.12) | |
β 3a : Supply effect on trend | 3.2709 | 0.76 | 0.456 | (−5.72, 12.26) | |
CCT clusters | β 0 : Intercept | 99.9540*** | 6.30 | 0.000 | (66.51, 133.40) |
β 1 : Secular (time) trend | 3.4686 | 0.85 | 0.408 | (−5.17, 12.10) | |
β 2a : Supply effect on level | 13.0980 | 0.77 | 0.454 | (−22.93, 49.13) | |
β 3a : Supply effect on trend | −5.1937 | −1.17 | 0.259 | (−14.57, 4.18) | |
β 2b : CCT effect on level | −45.53212* | −2.58 | 0.019 | (−82.71, −8.36) | |
β 3b : CCT effect on trend | 15.1152** | 4.13 | 0.001 | (7.38, 22.85) | |
Women receiving at least 2 doses Tetanus toxoid (Segmented regression) | |||||
Comparison clusters | β 0 : Intercept | 92.0673*** | 5.23 | 0.000 | (55.26, 128.88) |
β 1 : Secular (time) trend | −0.6289 | −0.14 | 0.891 | (−10.08, 8.82) | |
β 2a : Supply effect on level | 34.2304 | 2.05 | 0.054 | (−0.72, 69.18) | |
β 3a : Supply effect on trend | 2.6467 | 0.57 | 0.573 | (−7.00, 12.30) | |
CCT clusters | β 0 : Intercept | 119.5147*** | 4.77 | 0.000 | (66.62, 172.41) |
β 1 : Secular (time) trend | −1.7751 | −0.28 | 0.786 | (−15.36, 11.81) | |
β 2a : Supply effect on level | 45.8895 | 1.71 | 0.105 | (−10.66, 102.44) | |
β 3a : Supply effect on trend | 1.7798 | 0.25 | 0.805 | (−13.17, 16.73) | |
β 2b : CCT effect on level | −19.01 | −0.69 | 0.502 | (−77.51, 39.48) | |
β 3b : CCT effect on trend | 21.65** | 3.68 | 0.002 | (9.23, 34.08) | |
Women delivering with skilled attendance (Segmented regression) | |||||
Comparison clusters | β 0 : Intercept | 62.5497*** | 8.32 | 0.000 | (46.82, 78.28) |
β 1 : Secular (time) trend | −0.4847 | −0.25 | 0.804 | (−4.52, 3.55) | |
β 2a : Supply effect on level | 15.0429* | 2.11 | 0.049 | (0.11, 30.00) | |
β 3a : Supply effect on trend | 2.37 | 1.20 | 0.244 | (−1.76, 6.49) | |
CCT clusters | β 0 : Intercept | 37.8933*** | 6.72 | 0.000 | (26.00, 49.80) |
β 1 : Secular (time) trend | 0.0314 | 0.02 | 0.983 | (−3.02, 3.09) | |
β 2a : Supply effect on level | −0.0332 | −0.01 | 0.996 | (−12.75, 12.68) | |
β 3a : Supply effect on trend | 4.8661** | 3.05 | 0.007 | (1.50, 8.23) | |
β 2b : CCT effect on level | −8.2210 | −1.32 | 0.205 | (−21.38, 4.93) | |
β 3b : CCT effect on trend | 0.6618 | 0.50 | 0.624 | (−2.13, 3.46) | |
Newborns provided with OPV at birth (Segmented regression) | |||||
Comparison clusters | β 0 : Intercept | 120.0659*** | 6.35 | 0.000 | (80.47, 159.67) |
β 1 : Secular (time) trend | 3.7302 | 0.77 | 0.452 | (−6.44, 13.90) | |
β 2a : Supply effect on level | 15.1527 | 0.84 | 0.409 | (−22.44, 52.75) | |
β 3a : Supply effect on trend | −2.5497 | −0.51 | 0.613 | (−12.93, 7.83) | |
CCT clusters | β 0 : Intercept | 155.8673*** | 14.71 | 0.000 | (133.51, 178.22) |
β 1 : Secular (time) trend | 3.8689 | 1.42 | 0.173 | (−1.87, 9.61) | |
β 2a : Supply effect on level | −24.2458* | −2.14 | 0.047 | (−48.14, −0.35) | |
β 3a : Supply effect on trend | −0.6203 | −0.21 | 0.838 | (−6.94, 5.70) | |
β 2b : CCT effect on level | 1.1507 | 0.10 | 0.923 | (−23.57, 25.87) | |
β 3b : CCT effect on trend | 3.0739 | 1.23 | 0.234 | (−2.18, 8.33) |
Note: ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Effects of the CCT intervention in the regression model are shown in bold text.
Data source: facility logbooks in the 124 PHCs where data was collected.