Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1995 Jan 31;92(3):930–933. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.3.930

Praxic and nonverbal cognitive deficits in a large family with a genetically transmitted speech and language disorder.

F Vargha-Khadem 1, K Watkins 1, K Alcock 1, P Fletcher 1, R Passingham 1
PMCID: PMC42734  PMID: 7846081

Abstract

A pronounced speech and language disorder affecting half of the 30 members of the four-generational KE family has been attributed by some researchers to a specific defect in the generation of morphosyntactic rules. The reported selectivity of the impairment has led to the view that the affected members suffer from a grammar-specific disorder. Our investigations of the same KE family indicate that the inherited disorder has a broad phenotype which transcends impaired generation of syntactical rules and includes a striking articulatory impairment as well as defects in intellectual, linguistic, and orofacial praxic functions generally. Although the evidence from this family thus provides no support for the existence of "grammar genes," their linguistic difficulties do constitute a prominent part of their phenotype. Investigations of the neural and genetic correlates of their disorder could therefore uncover important clues to some of the bases of the primary human faculties of speech and language.

Full text

PDF
930

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gopnik M., Crago M. B. Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder. Cognition. 1991 Apr;39(1):1–50. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90058-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gopnik M. Feature-blind grammar and dysphagia. Nature. 1990 Apr 19;344(6268):715–715. doi: 10.1038/344715a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hurst J. A., Baraitser M., Auger E., Graham F., Norell S. An extended family with a dominantly inherited speech disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1990 Apr;32(4):352–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1990.tb16948.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lewis B. A. Pedigree analysis of children with phonology disorders. J Learn Disabil. 1992 Nov;25(9):586–597. doi: 10.1177/002221949202500908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Oldfield R. C., Wingfield A. Response latencies in naming objects. Q J Exp Psychol. 1965 Nov;17(4):273–281. doi: 10.1080/17470216508416445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pinker S. Rules of language. Science. 1991 Aug 2;253(5019):530–535. doi: 10.1126/science.1857983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Speech and language defects. Nature. 1990 Jul 19;346(6281):226–226. doi: 10.1038/346226a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Speech and language defects. Nature. 1990 Jul 19;346(6281):226–226. doi: 10.1038/346226a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tallal P., Ross R., Curtiss S. Unexpected sex-ratios in families of language/learning-impaired children. Neuropsychologia. 1989;27(7):987–998. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(89)90074-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vargha-Khadem F., Isaacs E. B., Papaleloudi H., Polkey C. E., Wilson J. Development of language in six hemispherectomized patients. Brain. 1991 Feb;114(Pt 1B):473–495. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.1.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES