Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 2;4:31. doi: 10.1186/s13613-014-0031-y

Table 5.

Mortality end points in included studies and results for EPN, LPN and EN groups

Outcome Study Study arms
Significance of results
EPN LPN EN
Mortality in ICU (%)
Casaer 2011[13]
6.3
6.1
x
p = 0.76
Heidegger 2013 [15]
x
0.5
7.0
p = 0.2118
Mortality in hospital (%)
Casaer 2011[13]
10.9
10.4
x
p = 0.63
Mortality at discharge (%)
Casaer 2011[13]
28.3
24.8
x
p = 0.007 (discharge from ICU)
Kutsogiannis 2011 [16]
NR
NR
NR
EPN vs EN: HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96; LPN vs EN: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.81 (discharge from hospital)
Mortality at day 28 (%)
Heidegger 2013 [15]
x
13.0
18.0
p = 0.1193
Mortality at day 60 (%)
Cahill 2011 [12]
42.2
27.9
34.2
p = 0.17
Kutsogiannis 2011 [16]
34.6
35.3
27.8
p = 0.02
Mortality at day 90 (%)
Bauer 2000 [11]
28.0
x
30.0
no p-value, ns
Casaer 2011[13]
11.2
11.2
x
p = 1.00
Mortality at 2 years (%) Bauer 2000 [11] 40.0 x 40.0 no p-value, ns

EPN, early parenteral nutrition; LPN, late parenteral nutrition; EN, enteral nutrition; ICU, intensive care unit; x, not applicable; p, p-value; ns, nonsignificant; NR, not reported; vs, versus; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. NB: studies used different definitions for EPN, LPN and EN. , comparing EN versus LPN.