Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 2;4:31. doi: 10.1186/s13613-014-0031-y

Table 6.

Length of stay end points in included studies and results for EPN, LPN and EN groups

Outcome Study   Study arms
Significance of results
EPN LPN EN
ICU length of stay
Bauer 2000 [11]
Mean days
16.9 ± 11.8
x
17.3 ± 12.8
no p-value, ns
Doig 2013 [14]
Mean days
8.6
x
9.3
RD −0.75 (−1.47 to 0.04); p = 0.06
Heidegger 2013 [15]
Mean days
x
13
13
p = 0.2592
Cahill 2011 [12]
Median days
15
22.1
12.4
p < 0.001
Kutsogiannis 2011 [16]
Median days
13.9
18.3
11.7
p = 0.003^
Hospital length of stay Bauer 2000 [11]
Mean days
31.2 ± 18.5
x
33.7 ± 27.7
p = 0.0022
Casaer 2011 [13]
Median days
16
14
x
HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.13; p = 0.04.
Doig 2013 [14]
Mean days
25.4
x
24.7
RD 0.7; 95% CI −1.4 to 3.1; p = 0.50
Heidegger 2013 [15]
Mean days
x
31
32
p = 0.8781
Cahill 2011 [12]
Median days
47.6
35
24.8
p < 0.001
Kutsogiannis 2011 [16] Median days 33.4 35.3 27.1 p = 0.004

EPN, early parenteral nutrition; LPN, late parenteral nutrition; EN, enteral nutrition; ICU, intensive care unit; x, not applicable; p, p-value; ns, nonsignificant; RD, risk difference; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. NB: studies used different definitions for EPN, LPN and EN. , comparing EPN versus EN and comparing LPN versus EN. ^, comparing EN versus LPN.