Table 4. Assessment of the methodological quality with COSMIN criteria.
Measure | Authors (Year) | Psychometric properties | ||||||||
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | ||
PPCP | Shapiro et al., (1981) | 0 | + b | 0 | ||||||
CSBL | Buijs et al. (1984) | + b | ||||||||
RIAS | Ong et al., 1998 | 0 b | 0 | 0 | ||||||
MCCS | Cegala et al. (1998) | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | |||||
SEGUE Framework | Makoul (2001) | ++ b, 0 c | +++ | |||||||
LIV-MAAS | Robinson et al. (2002) | 0 | ||||||||
Enzer et al. (2003) | 0 b,++ b | |||||||||
VR-MICS | Del Piccolo et al. (2004) | +++ | + | |||||||
Del Piccolo et al. (2005) | + b, c | 0 | ||||||||
4HCS | Krupat et al. (2006) | 0 | 0 b | 0 | 0 | |||||
Fossli et al. (2010) | 0 b | |||||||||
Scholl et al. (2014) | 0 | ++ b,+ c | 0 | 0d | ||||||
PBCI | Zandbelt et al. (2005) | +++ | ++ b | 0 | +++ | ++p/0ph | ||||
CAT | Makoul et al. (2007) | + | ++ | + | ||||||
MPI | Campbell et al. (2007) | 0 | 0 | + | + | |||||
TCom-skill GP Scale | Baumann et al. (2008) | + | + a | 0 | + | |||||
4HPQ | Gulbrandsen et al. (2008) | + | + b | 0 | + | 0 | 0d | |||
Fossli et al (2011) | 0 | + | ||||||||
CASC | Katsuyama et al. (2008) | 0 | 0 | |||||||
QQPPI | Bieber et al. (2010) | ++ | 0 a | 0 | ++ | 0 | ||||
SCCAP | Siminoff et al. (2011) | 0 | 0 b | 0 | 0 | |||||
GPFI | McMillan et al. (2011) | 0 b | 0 | |||||||
PHCPCS | Salt et al. (2012) | + | + a | 0 | + | 0 | ||||
PPCB | Wachira et al. (2013) | + | 0 a | 0 | + | +d | ||||
GCRS | Burt et al. (2014) | + | 0 |
COSMIN psychometric property boxes: A = internal consistency, B = reliability, C = measurement error, D = content validity, E = structural validity, F = hypotheses testing, G = cross-cultural validity, H = criterion validity, I = responsiveness. 4-point scale rating: +++ = excellent, ++ = good, + = fair, 0 = poor, empty space = COSMIN rating not applicable. For exact information regarding the definitions of psychometric properties and 4-point scale rating see COSMIN website (www.cosmin.nl). a = Test-Retest-Reliability, b = Inter-rater-Reliability, c = Intra-rater-Reliability, d = only evaluation of the quality of the translation procedure, p = patient version, ph = physician version.