Table 2. Risk of bias of included studies and Jadad scores.
Study and reference | Randomization | Double blind | Description of losses | Appropriate randomization | Appropriate double blind | Jadad classification |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sjögren et al.13 | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Low quality |
Sjögren et al.14 | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Low quality |
Andersen et al.15 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | High quality |
Andersen et al.16 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | High quality |
Pedersen et al.17 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | High quality |
Andersen et al.18 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | High quality |
Jay et al.19 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | High quality |
Zebis et al.20 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | High quality |
Macedo et al.21 | No | No | Yes | No | No | Low quality |
Marangoni22 | Yes | No | No | No | No | Low quality |