Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan;56(1):167–175. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M048777

TABLE 1.

Summary of basic characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

First Author (Year) Race Study Groupsa Na Sexa (M/F) Agea PNPLA3 Genotypea MAF OR (95% CI) Newcastle-Ottawa Scale Score
CC GC GG G versus C GC versus CC GG versus CC
Dutta (2013) North Indian Alcoholic cirrhosis Versus healthy control 60 versus 100 NA 49.5 (10.3) versus 32.9 (9.5) 24 versus 62 21 versus 69 15 versus 9 G: 42.5%g 2.41 (1.48, 3.92) 1.87 (0.90, 3.89) 4.31 (1.66, 11.15) 8
Nischalke (2011) Caucasian Alcoholic or HCV cirrhosis versus healthy control 322 versus 190 230/92 versus 106/84 56 (37–82) versus 40.5 (20–86)c 134 versus 112 142 versus 69 46 versus 9 G: 36.3%g 1.92 (1.44, 2.56) 1.72 (1.17, 2.52) 4.27 (2.00, 9.11) 7
Falleti (2011) Caucasian Cirrhosis versus healthy control 483 versus 428 344/139 versus 314/114 57 (22–86) versus 49 (18–77)c 168 versus 218 220 versus 175 95 versus 35 G: 42.4%g 1.84 (1.51, 2.24) 1.63 (1.23, 2.16) 3.52 (2.28, 5.44) 7
Trépo (2011) Caucasian ALD with cirrhosis versus healthy control 265 versus 328 NA NA 100 versus 181 130 versus 118 35 versus 29 G: 37.7%g 1.65 (1.29, 2.12) 1.99 (1.41, 2.83) 2.18 (1.26, 3.78) 7
Stickel (2011) Caucasian Alcoholic cirrhosis versus alcoholic control 210 versus 439 167/43 versus 439/0 50 (43–55) versus 39 (34–45)d 90 versus 264 93 versus 153 27 versus 22 G: 35.0%g 1.86 (1.44, 2.40) 1.78 (1.25, 2.53) 3.60 (1.95, 6.64) 8
Krawczyk (2011) NA CLD cirrhosisfversus CLD control 201 versus 698 547/352 50 (17–83)c 91 versus 394 90 versus 261 20 versus 43 G: 32.3%g 1.45 (1.14, 1.84) 1.49 (1.07, 2.08) 2.01 (1.13, 3.59) 8
Tian (2010) Mestizo Mexicansb Alcoholic cirrhosis versus alcoholic control 482 versus 305 411/71 versus 257/48 52 (11.6) versus 39 (12.7)e 59 versus 83 264 versus 198 371 versus 111 C: 27.5%g 2.28 (1.90, 2.74) 1.88 (1.28, 2.75) 4.70 (3.17, 6.98) 8

ALD, alcoholic liver disease; CI, confidence interval; CLD, chronic liver disease; F, female; HCV, hepatitis C virus; M, male; MAF, minor allele frequency; NA, not available.

a

Data presented as cirrhosis group versus control group.

b

Mixed European and Native American ancestry.

c

Median (range).

d

Median [25th percentile and 75th percentile (Q1–Q3)].

e

Mean (standard deviation).

f

CLD patients with cirrhosis were defined by liver stiffness values ≥13.0 kPa.

g

Indicates that the allele frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Fisher’s exact test).