Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 17;8:9–15. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S72744

Table 3.

Representative studies that provide analytical data for evaluating the relationship between salivary glucose and blood glucose concentrations as a threshold response

Study Species Sample Threshold (mg/dL) Slope r P-value Population
Forbat et al (1981)25 Human Parotid salivaa 136.8 6.4 0.20 0.38 20 diabetic adultsb
Amer et al (2001)15 Human Whole saliva 107.0 12.7 0.78 <0.05 135 diabetic adults
Abikshyeet et al (2012)14 Human Whole saliva 99.7 13.0 0.77 <0.01 106 diabetic adults
Current study Human Whole saliva 84.8 13.5 0.33 0.006 65, 11-year-old children
Yamaguchi et al (1998)26
 A Human Submaxillary + 110 22.4 6 healthy adults (A–F)c
 B sublingual saliva 68 87.1
 C 104 13.8
 D 60 111.1
 E 105 46.7
 F 88 51.0
Average 89.1±8.6 55.3±15.3
Hayford et al (1983)27 Human Urine 152.7 47.4 0.80 24 diabetic adults
Langley et al (1958)24 Dogs Parotid saliva 512.0 10–12 kg dogs

Notes: One study of urine glucose concentration is also included for comparison.

a

Stimulated with lemon juice and parotid massage

b

50 μL samples only

c

75 g oral glucose tolerance test.