Table 3.
Study | Species | Sample | Threshold (mg/dL) | Slope | r | P-value | Population |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forbat et al (1981)25 | Human | Parotid salivaa | 136.8 | 6.4 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 20 diabetic adultsb |
Amer et al (2001)15 | Human | Whole saliva | 107.0 | 12.7 | 0.78 | <0.05 | 135 diabetic adults |
Abikshyeet et al (2012)14 | Human | Whole saliva | 99.7 | 13.0 | 0.77 | <0.01 | 106 diabetic adults |
Current study | Human | Whole saliva | 84.8 | 13.5 | 0.33 | 0.006 | 65, 11-year-old children |
Yamaguchi et al (1998)26 | |||||||
A | Human | Submaxillary + | 110 | 22.4 | 6 healthy adults (A–F)c | ||
B | sublingual saliva | 68 | 87.1 | ||||
C | 104 | 13.8 | |||||
D | 60 | 111.1 | |||||
E | 105 | 46.7 | |||||
F | 88 | 51.0 | |||||
Average | 89.1±8.6 | 55.3±15.3 | |||||
Hayford et al (1983)27 | Human | Urine | 152.7 | 47.4 | 0.80 | 24 diabetic adults | |
Langley et al (1958)24 | Dogs | Parotid saliva | 512.0 | 10–12 kg dogs |
Notes: One study of urine glucose concentration is also included for comparison.
Stimulated with lemon juice and parotid massage
50 μL samples only
75 g oral glucose tolerance test.