Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 26;24(1):1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11248-014-9843-7

Table 1.

A comparison of genetic changes found at sites of double-strand break repair resulting from genetic engineering (Forsbach et al. 2003), cleavage with a restriction endonuclease (Salomon and Puchta 1998) and mutagenesis with gamma irradiation (Morita et al. 2009)

Microhomology Insertions Deletions Rearrangements
Number of sites/total sites analyzed Size range (bp) Number of sites/total sites analyzed Size range (bp) Number of sites/total sites analyzed Size range (bp) Number of sites/total sites analyzed Size range (bp)
Forsbach et al. (2003) 66/186a 1–8 109/186a 1–1,700 64/73 1–300 3/73 20, translocations
Salomon and Puchta (1998) 13/17 1–15 18/28 4–2,355 27/28 1–1,322 0/28 N/A
Morita et al. (2009) 16/21 1–8 1/21 1 21/21 1–129,700 2/21 1,284,800; 3,208,500

The number of sites at which microhomologies, insertions, deletions and rearrangements were identified is shown versus the total number of sites analyzed, as well as the size range of each

aSequences at the left and right borders of the T-DNA insertions were analyzed separately