Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 23.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Stat. 2014 Nov 1;42(6):2202–2242. doi: 10.1214/14-AOS1243

Table 6.

Hamming errors in Experiment 4b. It has the same setting as Experiment 4a, except that the signals always appear in adjacent pairs with opposite signs.

ϑ sp τp

4 5 6 7 8
0.35 253.7 CASE 138.6 60.8 23.3 7.2 1.8
lasso 223.0 158.9 97.9 54.8 27.1
SCAD 257.5 156.8 95.1 52.1 25.1
MCP 206.7 129.2 68.6 33.4 13.6

0.45 108.3 CASE 75.7 36.4 13.3 3.7 0.9
lasso 100.0 84.7 58.4 32.2 15.9
SCAD 99.2 83.2 56.6 30.6 14.9
MCP 98.1 76.0 44.8 21.5 8.9

0.55 46.2 CASE 38.6 20.0 8.9 3.6 1.0
lasso 45.4 40.1 31.0 20.6 10.9
SCAD 45.0 39.4 30.1 19.6 9.9
MCP 44.9 38.4 26.3 14.8 6.8