Table 2.
Ag ENMs 50 nm | Ag ENMs 80 nm | Ag ENM 200 nm | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Relative growth activity | ||||
[μg/cm2] | T = 2 h | 16.8 ± 1.71 | 24.42 ± 1.82 | 23.68 ± 1.51 |
T = 24 h | 23.68 ± 11.42 | 37.53 ± 17.58 | 36.37 ± 12.84 | |
T = 48 h | 15.94 ± 1.33 | 26.09 ± 11.63 | 21.71 ± 7.41 | |
[ENMs × 1011/cm2] | T = 2 h | 6.57 ± 0.6 | 2.51 ± 0.19 | 0.46 ± 0.03 |
T = 24 h | 9.26 ± 4.47 | 3.86 ± 1.81 | 0.75 ± 0.25 | |
T = 48 h | 6.23 ± 0.52 | 2.69 ± 1.2 | 0.42 ± 0.14 | |
[ENMs cm2/cm2] | T = 2 h | 2.3 ± 0.23 | 1.85 ± 0.13 | 0.61 ± 0.53 |
T = 24 h | 3.24 ± 1.33 | 2.84 ± 1.33 | 1.41 ± 0.5 | |
T = 48 h | 2.18 ± 0.18 | 1.97 ± 0.88 | 0.84 ± 0.29 | |
Plating efficiency | ||||
[μg/cm2] | T = 2 h | 35.58 ± 13.7 | - | - |
T = 24 h | 31.65 ± 15.81 | 31.65 ± 15.81 | - | |
T = 48 h | 17.83 ± 4.5 | 14.25 ± 1.94 | - | |
[ENMs × 1011/cm2] | T = 2 h | 13.91 ± 5.35 | - | - |
T = 24 h | 12.37 ± 6.18 | 3.66 ± 0.41 | - | |
T = 48 h | 6.97 ± 1.77 | 1.48 ± 0.2 | - | |
[ENMs cm2/cm2] | T = 2 h | 4.87 ± 1.89 | - | - |
T = 24 h | 4.37 ± 2.17 | 2.69 ± 0.3 | - | |
T = 48 h | 2.44 ± 0.62 | 1.08 ± 0.15 | - |
-IC50 could not be estimated. IC50 values were calculated for 3 different concentration characterization units: number of ENMs (ENMs × 1011/cm2), surface area of ENMs (ENMs cm2/cm2) and mass of ENMs (μg/cm2) per exposure surface.