Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 27;7(10):1180–1191. doi: 10.1111/eva.12199

Table 3.

Results of model selection using AIC values on the phenotypic parameters (centroid size, relative warp 1, relative warp 3, and relative warp 4) measured using tpsRelW (Rohlf 2006) for four populations of brook trout from Algonquin Park transplanted into three study lakes north of Lake Huron, Ontario, Canada

Response variable Model Log likelihood d.f. AIC Δ AIC
Centroid Lake × Source −565.99 13 1158.00 0.00
Lake + Source −574.08 7 1162.20 4.18
Lake −591.43 4 1190.90 32.88
Source −667.09 5 1344.20 186.19
Intercept −671.40 2 1346.80 188.81
RW1 Lake + Source + Centroid 855.94 8 −1695.90 0.00
Lake × Source + Centroid 860.79 14 −1693.60 2.31
Lake + Centroid 848.38 5 −1686.80 9.12
Lake 795.68 4 −1583.40 112.53
Lake × Source 804.15 13 −1582.30 113.58
RW3 Lake × Source + Centroid 835.90 14 −1643.80 0.00
Lake + Source + Centroid 828.99 8 −1642.00 1.83
Lake × Source 833.68 13 −1641.40 2.45
Lake + Source 827.62 7 −1641.20 2.57
Source + Centroid 824.73 6 −1637.50 6.35
RW4 Lake + Source + Centroid 901.51 8 −1787.00 0.00
Source + Centroid 896.71 6 −1781.40 5.62
Lake × Source + Centroid 903.09 14 −1778.20 8.86
Source 885.93 5 −1761.90 25.17
Lake + Source 887.02 7 −1760.00 26.99