Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 2;31(1):71–76. doi: 10.1007/s12288-014-0365-5

Table 2.

Comparison of platelet indices and percent change in platelet indices between groups

Group 1a (n = 68) Group 2b (n = 32) Control group (n = 50) p value
MPV (fl), mean ± SD 8.9 ± 1 8.7 ± 1.1 8.0 ± 1.1 <0.001
PDW (fl), median (IQR) 13.7 (12–14.7) 13.7 (12.8–14.8) 11.2 (9.9–13.1) <0.001
MPV6 (fl), median (IQR) 8.1 (7.8–8.7) 7.8 (7.6–8.3) 7.7 (7–8.6) 0.03
PDW6 (fl), median (IQR) 12.6 (11.4–13.8) 10.6 (10–11.2) 11 (9.8–12.8) <0.001
Δ%MPV, mean ± SD 7 ± 4.9 10.1 ± 6 1.11 ± 5.6 <0.001
Δ%PDW, median (IQR) 5.74 (3.4–8) 22.3 (17.1–25.9) 1.9 (−0.2–2.3) <0.001

MPV admission mean platelet volume levels, PDW admission platelet distribution width levels, MPV6 mean platelet volume levels at 6 month follow-up, PDW6 platelet distribution width levels at 6 month follow-up, Δ%MPV percent change for mean platelet volume levels, Δ%PDW percent change for platelet distribution width levels

aPatients with residual venous thrombosis

bPatients with complete resolution of thrombus