Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 11;5:5615. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6615

Table 3. Antenna effect and end-to-end efficiency for the four-/five-dye photonic wire and dendrimer systems.

      Relative Förster distance
      0.5 × R0*, 1.0 × R0 1.5 × R0
Construct Wires/Cy5.5 εCy3n/εCy5.5§ AE/E (%) AE/E AE/E
Linear 1 0.8 1.8/16 0.5/4 0.2/2
Bifurcated 2 1.6 2.9/14 0.9/7 0.1/1
Holliday junction 4 3.2 1.1/9 0.7/9 0.2/3
Eight-arm star 8 6.3 1.1/6 0.8/6 0.3/2
Four-dye Cy3/Cy5.5
2:1 dendrimer 8 6.3 2.2/17 (Cy3.5—ester)
2:1 dendrimer 8 6.3 3.5/28 (Cy3.5—phosphoramidite)
3:1 dendrimer 27 21.3 3.9/23
4:1 dendrimer 64 50.5 1.6/8
Five-dye dendrimer AF488/Cy5.5 εAF488n/εCy5.5||
2:1 (Cy5) 16 6 1.8/19
2:1(AF647) 16 6 1.4/16

AE, antenna effect; E, end-to-end efficiency (in some cases this is utilized as anywhere-to-end efficiency).

All values are collected from at least three experiments of independently assembled structures.

*See Table 1 for individual dye–dye donor–acceptor R0 values.

S.d. of all values <10%.

Wire=[Cy3→Cy3.5→Cy5]n.

§Initial Cy3n absorption at 550 nm relative to the final Cy5.5 absorption at 700 nm.

||Initial AF488n absorption at 550 nm relative to the final Cy5.5 absorption at 700 nm.

Displaying either Cy5 or AF647 at the fourth dye position.