Abstract
The PI3K pathway plays an important role in key cellular functions such as cell growth, proliferation and survival. Genetic and epigenetic alterations in different pathway components lead to aberrant pathway activation and have been observed in high frequencies in various tumor types. Consequently, significant effort has been made to develop antineoplastic agents targeting different nodes in this pathway. Additionally, PI3K pathway status may have predictive and prognostic implications, and may contribute to drug resistance in tumor cells. This article provides an overview of our current knowledge of the PI3K pathway with an emphasis on its application in cancer treatment.
In the late 1980s, PI3K was discovered as a key enzyme required for oncogenic transformation of normal cells by oncoviruses [1–3]. Since then, extensive research on this kinase family has resulted not only in identification of its members and their function, but also in recognition of the PI3K pathway and its role in health and disease [4,5]. Specifically, the PI3K pathway plays a role in a wide range of key cellular functions such as cell growth, proliferation and survival. Additionally, aberrant activation of the PI3K pathway has been observed with high frequency in human malignancies and may result from somatic mutation, gene amplification or epigenetic alteration in various pathway elements [4]. These observations suggest a significant role for the PI3K pathway in tumorigenesis, cancer progression and treatment resistance. Consequently, significant efforts have been made to develop antineoplastic agents targeting different nodes in the pathway. In the past, similar strategies have improved clinical outcomes: for example, erlotinib in EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma and trastuzumab in HER2/neu-positive breast cancer. Considering the high frequency of aberrant PI3K pathway activation in various tumor types, interventions targeting this pathway could be utilized in even larger patient populations and across a broad spectrum of malignancies. PI3K pathway status may also provide important predictive and prognostic information to guide therapy.
This article provides an overview of the structure and function of PI3Ks, key pathway components and aberrant pathway activation in cancer. PI3K isoforms, pathway status as a predictive and prognostic biomarker, and pathway molecular crosstalk are also discussed. Finally, a brief review of drugs targeting the PI3K pathway currently in clinical testing is provided.
Classification of PI3Ks
PI3Ks are a family of kinases that phosphorylate inositol-containing lipids (phosphatidylinositols; PIs) in the D-3 ring position. PI3Ks are classified, based on their structural features, into three classes. The different PI3K classes show distinct substrate preference in vitro and in vivo (Table 1) [6].
Table 1.
Classification and characteristics of PI3Ks.
| Class | Subunit | Protein | Gene | Tissue distribution | Substrate | Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | Regulatory | p85α | PIK3R1 | Ubiquitous; low in muscle [143,144] | PI, PI(4)P, PI(3,4)-P2 | Cell growth, proliferation and survival (see text) |
| p55α | PIK3R1 | High in brain; low in muscle [143,144] | ||||
| p50α | PIK3R1 | High in liver; moderate in kidney and brain [143,144] | ||||
| p85β | PIK3R2 | Ubiquitous; lowest in striated muscle [144] | ||||
| p55γ | PIK3R3 | High in brain and testis; moderate to low in other tissues[144] | ||||
| Catalytic | p101α | PIK3CA | Ubiquitous [47] | |||
| p101β | PIK3CB | Ubiquitous [145] | ||||
| p101δ | PIK3CD | High in leukocytes; moderate to low in other tissues [12] | ||||
| p37δ | PIK3CD | High expression in tumors [8] | ||||
|
| ||||||
| IB | Regulatory | p101 | PIK3R5 | High in leukocytes; moderate to low in other tissues [146] | ||
| p87 (p84, p87PIKAP) | PIK3R6 | High in leukocytes and heart [13] | ||||
| Catalytic | p101γ | PIK3CG | High in leukocytes; moderate to low in other tissues [146] | |||
|
| ||||||
| II | Catalytic | PI3KC2α | PIK3C2A | Ubiquitous; high in heart, placenta and ovary [147] | PI, PI(4)P | Membrane trafficking and receptor internalization |
| PI3KC2β | PIK3C2B | Ubiquitous; high in thymus and placenta[148] | ||||
| PI3KC2γ | PIK3C2G | Ubiquitous; high in liver and prostate [149] | ||||
|
| ||||||
| III | Regulatory | p150 (Vps15) | PIK3R4 | Ubiquitous [150] | PI | Protein sorting, phagosome formation and maturation, regulation of mTOR in response to availability of amino acids and autophagy |
| Catalytic | Vps34 | PIK3C3 | Ubiquitous [151] | |||
P: Phosphate; PI: Phosphatidylinositol.
Class I PI3Ks are heterodimers with a regulatory and a catalytic subunit. They are traditionally divided into class IA and IB [4,7]. The catalytic subunit of class IA PI3K has a number of isoforms: p110α, p110β and p110δ. p37δ is a recently described isoform that results from alternative splicing of the PIK3CD gene transcript [8]. In contrast, p110γ is the only catalytic subunit isoform in class IB [4,9]. Normal tissues ubiquitously express p110α and p110β; p110δ and p110γ are highly expressed in leukocytes [10–12]. The most prominent role in cancer has thus far been attributed to p110α, encoded by the PIK3CA gene, which has been found to be amplified or mutated in a wide range of solid tumors.
The regulatory subunit in class IA includes p85α, p85β and p55γ. Alternative transcription initiation sites in the gene encoding p85α results in two other isoforms: p55α and p50α [4]. The regulatory subunits of PI3K class IB are p101 and p87 (also known as p84 or p87PIKAP) [13,14].
Class II PI3Ks only have a catalytic subunit with significant sequence homology to that of PI3K class I (p110) [15]. This class appears to be involved in membrane trafficking and receptor internalization [16].
Class III consists of a single member, Vps34 catalytic subunit, which is regulated by p150 [17]. Vps34 is implicated in several key cellular functions including protein sorting [18], phagosome formation and maturation [19], regulation of mTOR in response to availability of amino acids [20,21] and autophagy [22,23].
Mechanism of PI3K class I activation
The three major mechanisms of activation of class I PI3Ks include RTKs, the GTPase Ras and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).
RTKs
The regulatory subunit in class IA is composed of a p110-binding domain flanked by two SRC-homology 2 (SH2) domains. The SH2 domains of p85 bind to the phosphotyrosine residues in the pY-xx-M context on activated RTKs, or the adaptor molecules. In turn, this relieves the inhibitory effect of p85 on p110 and results in its activation. There are other domains (e.g., SH3 and BCR homology domain) and distinct structural variations (e.g., N-terminal) in the regulatory subunit isoforms, which may provide alternate activation mechanisms [24].
Ras
Ras has a role in activation of both class IA and IB PI3Ks. All p110 isoforms contain a Ras-binding domain, which facilitates activation of the catalytic subunit [25–28], although the role of Ras in activation of p110β is controversial [27,29,30]. The ras–p110α interaction seems to be important for Ras-mediated tumorigenesis [25]. The p85 regulatory subunit can inhibit Ras-mediated activation [31]. Ras may also function as a coregulator of class IB PI3K [14].
GPCRs
GPCRs provide an important mechanism for PI3K activation. Directly, the Gβγ subunit activates p110β and p110γ isoforms [32,33]. GPCRs may also activate PI3K indirectly by activating tyrosine kinases and Ras.
Other mechanisms of PI3K activation, such as through small GTPases other than Ras, have been described and are the subject of ongoing research [24,34–36].
Once activated, p110 phosphorylates PI(4,5)P2 to produce PI(3,4,5)P3. This reaction is reversed by the phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN), which functions as a tumor suppressor. Phosphatidylinositols phosphate (PIP)3 is the principal secondary messenger in the PI3K pathway. There is evidence that PI3K signaling through PIP3 can be modulated by 5-phosphatases [37]. Recent data show that PI(3,4)P2 may also have a role in signal transduction. PIP2 is inhibited by inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II, which hydrolyzes PI(3,4)P2 in the D-4 position [38–40].
PIP3 recruits proteins with Pleckstrin homology domains, including PDK-1 and serine threonine kinase AKT (also known as PBK), to the cell membrane. PDK-1 phosphorylates AKT at its Thr-308 site. Phosphorylation of Ser-473 occurs through mTORC2 [41]. Activation of AKT results in a myriad of downstream signaling affecting cellular growth, proliferation and survival.
PI3K catalytic unit isoforms
Despite similar catalytic activity, p110 isoforms have nonredundant functions [42–45]. As an example, experiments in mice expressing a kinase-dead version of the endogenous PI3K p110α show an isoform-selective role for p110α in insulin signaling [46]. p110α and p110β catalytic units are expressed in all cells; however, p110δ and p110γ are highly expressed in leukocytes [10–12]. Loss of p110α and p110β in knock-out mice has been shown to be lethal during early embryonic phase [47,48]; in contrast, genetic inactivation of p110γ and p110δ results in defective immune responses [49–52].
It is not clear whether different regulatory and catalytic isoforms bind to each other preferentially. Although evidence suggests differential binding of regulatory subunits to receptors [53], recent data show that persistent inhibition of selected PI3K isoforms in normal cells can allow the remaining isoforms to couple to upstream signaling pathways in which they are not normally engaged [7,54].
p110α has been widely implicated in carcinogenesis, mainly due to frequent mutations and amplification of PIK3CA in different cancers (Table 2). Despite lack of such mutations among non-α p110s, there is emerging evidence of their role in a multitude of malignancies [11]. In a prostate cancer cell line, knockdown of p110β has been shown to suppress downstream effectors of the PI3K pathway [55]. Increased activity and expression of p110β has also been observed in tumor biopsies of human colon and bladder cancers [56]. Upregulation of p110γ and over-expression of p110δ has been reported in Chronic and acute myeloid leukemia, respectively [57,58].
Table 2.
Aberrant activation of PI3K pathway.
| Gene | Variation | Cancer type | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIK3CA | Mutation | Breast (26%†) | [98,152–154] |
| Colon (12%†) | [98] | ||
| Endometrial (25%) | [155] | ||
| Lung (3%†) | [102] | ||
| CNS (5%†) | [98,156] | ||
| Ovarian (9%†) | [153,157] | ||
| Gastric (12%†) | [98] | ||
| Amplification | SCCHN (37%) | [158] | |
| Lung (18% [43% in squamous]) | [102,159] | ||
| Cervical (69%) | [160] | ||
| Gastric (36%) | [161] | ||
| Esophageal (6%) | [162] | ||
| Thyroid (8%) | [163] | ||
| Ovarian (24.6%) | [157] | ||
| Prostate (13%) | [164] | ||
| Breast (21%) | [152] | ||
|
| |||
| PIK3R1 | Mutation | CNS (4%†) | [165,166] |
| Ovarian (2%†) | [167] | ||
| Colon (5%†) | [167] | ||
| Endometrial (26%†) | [168] | ||
|
| |||
| PTEN | Mutation | Cowden syndrome | [169] |
| Endometrial (38%†) | [170] | ||
| CNS (18%†) | [171] | ||
| Prostate (14%†) | [171] | ||
| Breast (5%†) | [171] | ||
| Ovarian (6%†) | |||
| Promoter hypermethylation | Glioblastoma (9%) | [172] | |
| Prostate (56%) | [173] | ||
| Breast (48%) | [103] | ||
| Melanoma (60%) | [174,175] | ||
| Gastric (39%) | [176] | ||
| Colon (8%) | [177] | ||
| Endometrial (19%) | [178] | ||
| NSCLC (35%) | [179] | ||
| LOH | Glioblastoma (69%) | [180] | |
| Prostate (32%) | [181] | ||
| Gastric (36%) | [161] | ||
|
| |||
| AKT1 | Mutation | Breast (5%†) | [182,183] |
| Colon (<1%†) | [182] | ||
| Ovarian (1%) | [182] | ||
| Lung (<1%†) | [184] | ||
| Endometrial (2%†) | [185] | ||
| Amplification | Gastric (20%) | [186] | |
|
| |||
| AKT2 | Mutation | Colon (1%) | [187] |
| Amplification | SCCHN (30%) | [158] | |
| Pancreatic (10–20%) | [188,189] | ||
| Ovarian (12–13%) | [190,191] | ||
| Breast (3%) | [191] | ||
| Colon (1%) | [187] | ||
| Lymphoma (1%) | [192] | ||
|
| |||
| AKT3 | Mutation | Melanoma (<1%) | [193] |
|
| |||
| PDK1 | Mutation | Colon (1%) | [187] |
LOH: Loss of heterozygosity; NSCLC: Non-small cell lung cancer; PIK3CA: Phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic isoform p110α; PIK3R1: Phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit p85; SCCHN: Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Data taken from [201].
Downstream effects of PI3K activation
Biological consequences of PI3K pathway activation can be divided into the following categories: cell growth and metabolism; cell survival; proliferation; angiogenesis; and invasion and metastasis (Figure1). Pathway functions independent of the catalytic activity of PI3K enzyme [24,46] and independent of AKT [59] have also been described and are beyond the scope of this review.
Figure 1. The PI3K pathway.
eNOS: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase; GPCR: G protein-coupled receptor; NO: Nitric oxide; PIP: Phosphatidylinositols phosphate.
Cell growth & metabolism
Regulation of cell growth is mediated through AKT–mTOR interaction. Phosphorylation of TSC2 by AKT inhibits inactivation of rheb through the rheb-GTPase function of the TSC1–TSC2 complex. Rheb is the proximal activator of mTORC1 [60,61]. Downstream targets of mTORC1 include S6K and 4EBP1. S6K (p70 S6 kinase), which promotes protein synthesis and is activated by mTORC1. mTORC1 inhibits 4EBP1, a negative regulator of protein synthesis. The overall result of mTORC1 activation is increased protein synthesis and cell growth [62]. It should also be noted that S6K negatively regulates the PI3K pathway by inhibiting RTK-mediated pathway activation [63,64].
The PI3K pathway is also involved in mediation of insulin signal transduction. Specifically, AKT activation downstream of PI3K enhances cellular glucose uptake by promoting translocation of GLUT4 to the cell membrane [65]. Metabolic consequences of PI3K pathway inhibition, such as abnormal glucose homeostasis and hyperlipidemia, have been well documented in preclinical models and have been observed in human clinical studies [46,66,67].
Cell survival
Survival is mediated through several mechanisms: inhibition of FOXO (members of the winged helix or forkhead family of transcription factors) [68,69]; activation of NF-κB [69,70]; phosphorylation of MDM2, a negative regulator of p53 [71–73]; and inhibition of pro-apoptotic BCL-2 family protein, BAX [74]. BAD, another pro-apoptotic member of BCL-2 family, was initially thought to be a key target of AKT [75,76], but subsequent studies did not support a major role for it [69,77,78].
Proliferation
Although AKT was originally recognized as a survival kinase, it also promotes cell proliferation. Cyclin D-1 is a cell cycle regulator and is involved in G1 to S phase progression. GSK3β phosphorylates cyclin D-1, resulting in its nuclear export and eventual degradation in the cytoplasm. AKT inhibits the kinase activity of GSK3β via phosphorylation, thereby promoting cell proliferation [79]. AKT also downregulates cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors KIP1 and CIP1 (p27 and p21), thus promoting cell proliferation [80,81].
Angiogenesis
In animal models, the PI3K pathway has been shown to play a key role in physiologic and pathologic angiogenesis [82,83]. In tumors, pro-angiogenic effects of the PI3K pathway are conferred through HIF-1 and VEGF. HIF-1 is a heterodimer with α and β subunits and is an activator of VEGF transcription [84]. PI3K pathway activation results in HIF-1α upregulation and expression of VEGF [85]. Additionally, recent data suggest a HIF-1α-independent pathway for PI3K-mediated VEGF upregulation [86]. In preclinical studies, pathway inhibition by LY294002 (a PI3K inhibitor) or rapamycin (an mTOR inhibitor) has been shown to suppress HIF-1α and VEGF [82,85]. Reduction in eIF4E (a transcription factor downstream of mTOR) using antisense RNA to eIF4E has been shown to decrease VEGF expression in head and neck squamous cell cancer cell lines [87]. While these observations suggest that HIF-1α activation occurs downstream of mTOR and might be mediated through eIF4E, an mTOR-independent mechanism has also been suggested [88]. Phosphorylation and activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by AKT is another mechanism by which the PI3K pathway is involved in angiogenesis [89].
Invasion & metastasis
In cancer cell lines, activation of the PI3K pathway has been shown to promote invasion through upregulation of MMP-9 [90–92]. NF-κB is thought to mediate the effect of AKT activation on MMP-9 [90]. More recently, mTOR has been shown to play a regulatory role in migration, invasion and epithelial–mesenchymal transition in colon cancer through RhoA and Rac1 [93]. RhoA and Rac1 are small GTPases involved in actin cytoskeletal rearrangement and cell migration [94,95]. Early studies suggest that PI3K pathway inhibition at the level of AKT or mTOR could result in suppression of tumor migration and metastasis [93,96].
Aberrant pathway activation in cancer
Aberrant PI3K pathway activation has been shown in various malignancies. Pathway activation can arise from aberrant upstream signaling, such as EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [97]. Alternatively, somatic mutations, amplification or epigenetic alterations of various pathway components may also lead to pathway activation.
Gain-of-function mutations of PIK3CA are common in various malignancies. The majority (>80%) of these mutations are missense mutations that occur in three specific hotspots [98–100]. PIK3CA mutations have been observed with high frequency in breast (26%), endometrial (26%) and colon cancers (13%) [201]. Such activating mutations have not been observed in non-α isoforms. Over-expression of non-α isoforms in cell cultures, however, has been shown to induce oncogenic transformation [30]. It has been postulated that lack of cancer-specific mutations in the non-α p110s may reflect their inherent oncogenic potential [101]. Pathway activation may also result from PIK3CA gene amplification, an aberration observed with high frequency in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (43% in one study [102]), as well as many other malignancies (Table 2).
Inactivation of PTEN leads to unopposed phosphorylation of PIP2 to PIP3 and downstream pathway activation. PTEN inactivation can be due to germ-line mutation (as occurs in Cowden syndrome), epigenetic silencing through promoter hypermethylation or loss of heterozygosity. Low PTEN expression has been reported in two-thirds of ERBB2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer through promoter hypermethylation [103]. Other pathway components such as PIK3R1 and various isoforms of AKT and PDK1 have not been studied to the same extent as PTEN and PIK3CA; however, genetic aberrancy of these components has also been reported. Table 2 summarizes known PI3K pathway alterations in human cancers.
Significance of molecular crosstalk
There is a significant degree of molecular crosstalk between cellular signal transduction pathways. This crosstalk is a potential mechanism for resistance to therapies that target a single step in a specific pathway. While a detailed review of molecular crosstalk between PI3K and other pathways – such as MAPK [104], NOTCH [105,106], Wnt [106] and JNK [107] – is beyond the scope of this review, selected examples are provided to reflect its significance and clinical implications.
MAPK pathway
Crosstalk between MAPK and PI3K pathways can occur at different levels [104]. Ras activates both Raf and PI3K. In addition, TSC2 can be phosphorylated by either AKT in the PI3K pathway or ERK in the MAPK pathway, leading to activation of mTOR [108]. Therefore, inhibitors of the two pathways may have synergistic effects and minimize the risk of resistance; such strategies are currently under investigation in a Phase II trial (NCT01363232) [202].
Estrogen receptor
Crosstalk between the estrogen receptor and PI3K pathways is of particular importance in breast cancer. Ligand (estrogen)-independent activation of estrogen receptor α through the PI3K/AKT pathway may result in resistance to antiestrogen therapies [109,110]. Inhibition of mTOR, however, has been shown to restore sensitivity to hormonal therapy in breast cancer cell lines with AKT upregulation [111,112]. A Phase II study of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole with or without the mTOR inhibitor everolimus as neo-adjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has shown improvement in clinical responses [113]. Further studies are required to establish the clinical benefit and to determine the optimal settings for application of such strategies.
PI3K pathway components as predictive & prognostic biomarkers
Over the past several years, significant effort has been made to identify biomarkers to guide cancer therapy. Predictive biomarkers provide information regarding treatment outcomes (e.g., umor response and toxicities). In comparison, prognostic biomarkers reflect the natural history of the disease and help to risk-stratify patients. Some biomarkers may be both prognostic and predictive, such as HER2/neu status in breast cancer and KRAS status in colorectal cancer. Because aberrant activation of the PI3K pathway occurs frequently in various malignancies, the value of PI3K pathway components as predictive and prognostic biomarkers has been a focus of multiple studies.
In HER2-positive breast cancer, activation of the PI3K pathway, determined by low PTEN expression or PIK3CA mutation, has been shown to be associated with resistance to the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, trastuzumab [114–116]. However, the effect of PTEN status on treatment outcomes with the EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib is less clear [117,118]. PIK3CA mutations have variable prognostic significance in breast cancer [119]. PTEN status has also been reported to predict disease recurrence in node-negative breast cancer [120]. In ovarian cancer, PIK3CA amplification has been associated with shorter survival [121] and resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy [122]. PIK3CA amplification is also associated with poor prognosis in endometrial carcinoma [123]. Exon 20 PIK3CA mutation is a negative prognostic factor in stage III colon cancer patients [124]. Additionally, PIK3CA mutation has been associated with shorter overall survival and time to progression in stage IV NSCLC patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and may reflect resistance to therapy [125]. PTEN loss has been observed in EGFR mutated NSCLC and may confer resistance to erlotinib [126]. Genetic variation (single nucleotide polymorphisms) in several pathway components has been reported to predict toxicity and distant progression in patients with NSCLC treated with a platinum-based regimen [127]. It has been postulated that single nucleotide polymorphisms leading to downregulation of the pathway render normal cells more susceptible to chemotherapy and hence are associated with increased toxicities. Also, in NSCLC, AKT phosphorylation has been reported to be a poor prognostic factor [128]. PI3K pathway status may also have implications in radiation resistance [129].
Pathway interruption: the PI3K pathway as a drug target
Table 3 summarizes drugs targeting the PI3K pathway currently in clinical testing.
Table 3.
Drugs targeting the PI3K pathway.
| Drug | Description | Manufacturer | Study phase | Study setting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pan-PI3K inhibitors | ||||
|
| ||||
| BKM120 | Oral | Novartis | I, I/II, II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors, prostate, leukemia, endometrial, lung and brain |
| With chemotherapy: advanced solid tumors (carboplatin-paclitaxel or paclitaxel alone), colon (irinotecan) and breast (capecitabine) | ||||
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (GSK1120212† and MEK162†), GIST (imatinib), renal (bevacizumab), brain (bevacizumab) and breast (trastuzumab) | ||||
| With endocrine therapy: breast (fulvestrant and letrozole) | ||||
| With chemotherapy and other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (paclitaxel and trastuzumab) | ||||
|
| ||||
| PX-866 | Oral | Oncothyreon | I, I/II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors, prostate and brain |
| With chemotherapy: NSCLC/SCCHN (docetaxel) | ||||
| With other targeted agents: colon/SCCHN (cetuximab) | ||||
|
| ||||
| XL147 (SAR245408) | Oral | Exelixis/Sanofi | I, I/II, II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors, lymphoma, endometrial and brain |
| With chemotherapy: advanced solid tumors (carboplatin/paclitaxel) | ||||
| With other targeted agents: breast (trastuzumab), advanced solid tumors (erlotinib and MSC1936369B†) | ||||
| With chemotherapy and other targeted agents: breast (paclitaxel/trastuzumab) | ||||
| With endocrine therapy: breast (letrozole) | ||||
|
| ||||
| GDC-0941 | Oral | Genentech | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors and NHL |
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (erlotinib and GDC-0973†) and breast (trastuzumab) | ||||
| With chemotherapy: NSCLC (carboplatin/paclitaxel) | ||||
| With chemotherapy and other targeted agents: breast (paclitaxel/bevacizumab), NSCLC (carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab) | ||||
| With endocrine therapy: breast (fulvestrant) | ||||
|
| ||||
| BAY80–6946 | Intravenous | Bayer | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors |
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (BAY86–9766†) | ||||
| With chemotherapy: advanced solid tumors (gemcitabine, cisplatin/gemcitabine and paclitaxel) | ||||
|
| ||||
| ZSTK474 | Oral | Zenyaku Kogyo | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors |
|
| ||||
| GSK2126458 | Oral | GlaxoSmithKline | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors |
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (GSK1120212†) | ||||
|
| ||||
| Isoform-specific PI3K inhibitors | ||||
|
| ||||
| BYL719 | Oral; PI3Kα inhibitor | Novartis | I, I/II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors |
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (MEK162†) | ||||
|
| ||||
| CAL-101 | Oral; PI3Kδ inhibitor | Calistoga | I, I/II, II | Monotherapy: hematologic malignancies |
| With chemotherapy: NHL/CLL (bendamustine or fludarabine) | ||||
| With other targeted agents: NHL/CLL (rituximab and ofotumumab) | ||||
| With chemotherapy and other targeted agents: NHL/CLL (bendamustine and rituximab) | ||||
|
| ||||
| AMG 319 | Oral; PI3Kδ inhibitor | Amgen | I | Monotherapy: lymphoid malignancies |
|
| ||||
| INK1117 | Oral; PI3Kα inhibitor | Intellikine | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors |
|
| ||||
| Dual PI3K-mTOR inhibitors | ||||
|
| ||||
| SF1126 | Intravenous | Semafore | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors |
|
| ||||
| PF-05212384 (PKI-587) | Intravenous | Pfizer | I, II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors and endometrial |
| With chemotherapy: advanced solid tumors (irinotecan) | ||||
|
| ||||
| PF-04691502 | Oral | Pfizer | I, II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors and endometrial |
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (PD-0325901†) | ||||
| With chemotherapy: advanced solid tumors (irinotecan) | ||||
| With endocrine therapy: breast (letrozole) | ||||
|
| ||||
| XL765(SAR245409) | Oral | Exelixis/Sanofi | I, I/II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors, brain and lymphoma |
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (erlotinib, MSC1936369B†) and NHL/CLL (rituximab) | ||||
| With chemotherapy: brain (temozolamide with or without radiation) and NHL/CLL (bendamustine) | ||||
| With chemotherapy and other targeted agents: NHL/CLL (bendamustine and rituximab) | ||||
| With endocrine therapy: breast (letrozole) | ||||
|
| ||||
| BEZ235 | Oral | Novartis | I, I/II, II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors, kidney, endometrial and breast |
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (MEK162†) | ||||
| With chemotherapy: advanced solid tumors (paclitaxel) | ||||
| With chemotherapy and other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (paclitaxel/trastuzumab) | ||||
| With endocrine therapy: breast (letrozole) | ||||
|
| ||||
| BGT226 | Oral | Novartis | I, I/II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors |
|
| ||||
| DS-7423 | Oral | Daiichi Sankyo | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors |
|
| ||||
| GDC-0980 | Oral | Genentech | I, II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors/NHL, endometrial and kidney |
| With chemotherapy: breast (paclitaxel), advanced solid tumors (capecitabine and carboplatin/paclitaxel) | ||||
| With chemotherapy and other targeted agents: breast (paclitaxel and trastuzumab, paclitaxel and bevacizumab), advanced solid tumors (FOLFOX and bevacizumab, carboplatin/paclitaxel and bevacizumab) | ||||
| With endocrine therapy: breast (fulvestrant) | ||||
|
| ||||
| PWT33597 | Oral | Pathway Therapeutics | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors |
|
| ||||
| MK-2206 | Oral, allosteric inhibitor | Merck | I, II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors, lymphoma, ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer, gastric/esophageal, breast, neuroendocrine, SCCHN, endometrial, kidney, liver and biliary |
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (erlotinib and dalotuzumab), advanced solid tumors/breast (trastuzumab, trastuzumab and lapatinib, and lapatinib), NSCLC (gefitinib and erlotinib), advanced solid tumors (AZD6422†) and colon (AZD6422†) | ||||
| With chemotherapy: advanced solid tumors (carboplatin and paclitaxel, docetaxel) and advanced solid tumors/breast (paclitaxel) | ||||
| With chemotherapy and other targeted agents: CLL (bendamustine/rituximab) and breast (paclitaxel/trastuzumab) | ||||
| With endocrine therapy: breast (aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant) and prostate (bicalutamide) | ||||
|
| ||||
| Perifosine (KRX-0401) | Oral, PH domain inhibitor | Keryx | I, II, III | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors/hematologic malignancies, pediatric advanced solid tumors, brain, CLL, NSCLC, sarcoma, renal, melanoma, prostate, SCCHN, breast and pancreatic |
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (trastuzumab, sorafenib and sunitinib), pediatric advanced solid tumors (temsirolimus), GIST (imatinib), MM (bortezomib and UCN-01‡) and brain (temsirolimus) | ||||
| With chemotherapy: advanced solid tumors (gemcitabine, docetaxel and paclitaxel), colon (capecitabine), MM (lenalidomide) and ovarian (docetaxel) | ||||
| With endocrine therapy: breast (NS) | ||||
|
| ||||
| GSK2141795 | Oral, ATP-competitive inhibitor | GlaxoSmithKline | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors/lymphoma |
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (GSK1120212†) | ||||
|
| ||||
| SR13668 | Oral | SRI International | I | Monotherapy: healthy volunteers |
|
| ||||
| VD-0002 (Triciribine, VQD-002, TCN-PM) | Oral | VioQuest | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors/advanced hematologic malignancies |
|
| ||||
| mTOR catalytic-site inhibitors | ||||
|
| ||||
| AZD8055 | Oral | AstraZeneca | I, I/II | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors, brain |
|
| ||||
| OSI-027 | Oral | Astellas | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors/lymphoma |
|
| ||||
| INK128 | Oral | Intellikine | I | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors, MM/WM |
| With chemotherapy: advanced solid tumors/breast (paclitaxel) | ||||
| With chemotherapy and other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors/breast (paclitaxel and trastuzumab) | ||||
|
| ||||
| Rapalogs | ||||
|
| ||||
| Everolimus (Afinitor®, RAD001) | Oral | Novartis | US FDA approved for advanced renal cell carcinoma, advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma associated with tuberous sclerosis | |
|
| ||||
| Temsirolimus (Torisel®, CCI-779) | Intravenous | Wyeth | FDA approved for advanced renal cell carcinoma | |
|
| ||||
| Ridaforolimus (deforolimus, AP23573 and MK-8669) | Intravenous and oral | Ariad | I, II, III | Monotherapy: advanced solid tumors, pediatric advanced solid tumors, NSCLC, endometrial, sarcoma, hematologic malignancies, prostate and brain |
| With other targeted agents: advanced solid tumors (MK-0752§, MK-2206, bevacizumab and dalotuzumab), breast (dalotuzumab and trastuzumab) and colon/NSCLC/SCCHN (cetuximab) | ||||
| With chemotherapy: sarcoma (doxorubicin alone, doxorubicin and ifosfamide, and gemcitabine and docetaxel), endometrial/ovarian (paclitaxel and carboplatin) and renal (vorinostat) | ||||
| With endocrine therapy: prostate (bicalutamide) | ||||
MEK inhibitor
Chk1-specific inhibitor
Gamma-secretase inhibitor.
CLL: Chronic lymphocytic lymphoma; GIST: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; MM: Multiple myeloma; NHL: Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; NS: Not specified; NSCLC: Non-small-cell lung cancer; PH: Pleckstrin homology domain; SCCHN: Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; WM: Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia.
Data taken from [203].
Pan-PI3K inhibitors
Inhibitors of PI3K enzymes can be isoform-specific or nonspecific. While pan-PI3K inhibitors may effectively block the pathway at the level of PI3K enzyme, such an approach may cause untoward side effects due to the impact on a wide range of physiologic cellular processes. A potential application for pan-PI3K inhibitors is when pathway activation is due to aberrant upstream signaling or PTEN inactivation. BKM120 (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) is a pan-PI3K inhibitor; in the Phase I study of BKM120 in patients with advanced solid tumors, dose-limiting toxicities were hyperglycemia, abdominal pain, skin rash and mood alterations [130]. Other side effects included decreased appetite, rash, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, hyperglycemia, anxiety, depression and mucositis. While stable disease was the main clinical response (occurring in 26 patients – 58% of cases), two patients with breast cancer showed a partial response (one with PIK3CA mutation and one with mutated KRAS and p53).
Isoform-specific PI3K inhibitors
In contrast to pan-PI3K inhibitors, isoform-specific drugs can target the particular isoenzyme involved in the carcinogenic process and therefore may have a more favorable side-effect profile. Isoform-specific inhibitors of p110α and p110δ are currently in Phase I/II clinical trials. CAL-101 (Calistoga Pharmaceuticals, Seattle, WA, USA) is a p110δ isoform-specific inhibitor that has been studied as a monotherapy in a Phase I trial with 54 previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients [131]. CAL-101 resulted in a 26% response rate; median duration of response was not reached at the time of the report. Significant (grade ≥3) side effects included infection, cytopenias, neutropenic fever and transaminitis. Preliminary results of another Phase I study of CAL-101 suggest that it can safely be administered in combination with rituximab and/or bendamustine in pretreated patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [132].
Dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors
mTOR and PI3K enzymes both belong to the phosphatidylinositol kinase-related family of kinases and have significant sequence homology in their active catalytic sites. Dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors benefit from this structural similarity and inhibit PI3K, mTORC1 and mTORC2. This approach offers the advantage of interrupting the PI3K pathway at more than one node, resulting in more effective pathway suppression. Additionally, dual PI3K/mTOR inhibition can prevent the paradoxical upstream activation of AKT that can be seen with mTORC1 inhibitors [63]. LY294002 is an agent in this class [133]; however, poor pharmacokinetic properties have limited its clinical use. To improve solubility and tumor delivery, LY294002 has been conjugated to an integrin targeting peptide, to form the prodrug SF1126 (Semafore Pharmaceuticals, Westfield, IN, USA). Currently, there are many dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors in clinical phase and preclinical development. BEZ235 (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) is another example of this class; dose-limiting toxicities associated with BEZ235 were asthenia and thrombocytopenia. Common side effects included nausea, diarrhea, vomiting and fatigue [134].
mTOR inhibitors (rapalogs)
Rapamycin and its related compounds are mTOR inhibitors and have been in clinical use for many years. Rapamycin forms a complex with FKBP12, which binds to the FRB domain of mTOR to exert its inhibitory effect [135]. The FKBP12–rapamycin complex can bind to mTORC1 but not to mTORC2 [136,137]. Temsirolimus and everolimus are two drugs in this category that are approved by the US FDA for use in advanced renal cell carcinoma (both everolimus and temsirolimus) and advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (everolimus). Ridaforolimus (Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA) is a novel rapalog in late stages of clinical development [138]. In a Phase III study of 711 pretreated patients with metastatic sarcomas (SUCCEED trial), ridaforolimus was shown to statistically improve progression-free survival compared with placebo (HR 0.72, p = 0.0001) [139]; the median progression-free survival was 17.7 versus 14.6 weeks for ridaforolimus and placebo, respectively. Clinical benefit rate (defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease, lasting for 4 months or more), was significantly higher in the active treatment arm (40.6 vs 28.6%, p= 0.0009). Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 64% of patients receiving ridaforolimus. Significant side effects of any grade included stomatitis, infections, fatigue, cytopenias, diarrhea, cough, rash, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia and pneumonitis. Overall, the side effect profile of ridaforolimus seems to be similar to that of other members of this family.
mTOR catalytic-site inhibitors
In contrast to the allosteric mechanism of rapalogs, which preferentially inhibits mTORC1, mTOR catalytic-site inhibitors block both mTORC1 and mTORC2. Inhibition of mTORC2 blocks AKT phosphorylation at the S473 residue, but not at T308 (site of phosphorylation by PDK1). Therefore, inhibition of mTORC1 and mTORC2 by these agents may mitigate rather than prevent the paradoxical upstream activation of AKT. OSI-027 is an example of this class; in Phase I studies of the compound in patients with advanced solid tumors, dose-limiting toxicities included decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and fatigue. Other potential drug-related toxicities were nausea and vomiting, pneumonia, asthenia, diarrhea, anorexia, elevated creatinine and reversible corrected QT interval prolongation [140].
AKT inhibitors
Drugs in this class inhibit AKT through various mechanisms such as competitive binding at the ATP-binding site, prevention of AKT localization to cell membrane and allosteric inhibition [141]. MK2206 (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) is an allosteric pan-AKT inhibitor with a long half-life that can be given in a weekly schedule. In a Phase I study of MK2206 in 70 patients with advanced solid tumors, dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 rash and mucositis for an every-other-day schedule and rash for a weekly schedule. Other reported drug-related toxicities included rash, nausea, fatigue and hyperglycemia [142].
Future perspective
The PI3K pathway plays an important role in key physiologic and pathologic cellular functions. Numerous drugs targeting different nodes within the pathway have been developed and are currently under clinical testing. The optimal setting for use of PI3K pathway inhibitors remains to be defined. In theory, the highly varying prevalence of pathway activation among different tumor types may limit their application to selected patient populations. As single agents, inhibitors of the PI3K pathway may confer a meaningful clinical benefit when the tumor is essentially driven by aberrant pathway activation. However, involvement of more than one pathway in tumorigenesis and molecular crosstalk between various pathways limit the efficacy of PI3K pathway inhibitors as single agents and argues for their use in conjunction with other targeted therapies – such as inhibitors of the MAPK pathway – or cytotoxic agents. There may be a role for pathway inhibitors in preventing/overcoming resistance to other antineoplastic agents. An armamentarium of multiple drugs that target the PI3K pathway at different nodes provides an exciting opportunity to personalize treatment based on molecular characteristics of an individual’s tumor, comorbid conditions and toxicities. Finally, the PI3K pathway and its components may also serve as predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers. Further research is needed to better understand this intricate signal transduction network and to elucidate optimal strategies for the clinical use of drugs targeting this pathway.
Executive summary.
Background
Extensive research on the PI3K family has resulted in identification of its members and their function, as well as recognition of the role of the PI3K pathway in health and disease.
Classification
PI3Ks are classified based on their structural features into three classes; class I has been studied extensively, is involved in carcinogenesis and is the principal focus of this review.
Class I PI3Ks are heterodimers with a regulatory subunit (p85) and a catalytic subunit (p110).
PI3K activation
Class I PI3Ks can be activated through RTKs, the GTPase Ras and G-protein-coupled receptors.
PI3K isoforms
Despite similar catalytic activity, p110 isoforms have nonredundant functions.
Downstream effects of PI3K activation
PI3K pathway is involved in cell growth and metabolism, cell survival, proliferation, angiogenesis, and invasion and metastasis.
Pathway activation in cancer
PI3K pathway activation occurs frequently in malignancies as a result of somatic mutations, amplification or epigenetic alterations of various pathway components, as well as aberrant upstream signaling.
Molecular crosstalk
Molecular crosstalk between PI3K and other signal transduction pathways, such as MAPK, NOTCH, Wnt and JNK, is a potential mechanism for resistance to treatments and may have therapeutic implications.
Pathway components as biomarkers
Early studies suggest that various PI3K pathway components, such as PTEN, may have predictive and/or prognostic value.
Pathway interruption
Frequent pathway activation in cancer and the presence of multiple druggable pathway nodes have made the PI3K pathway a desirable target for cancer therapy. Numerous drugs (including pan-PI3K inhibitors, isoform-specific PI3K inhibitors, dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, rapalogs [mTORC1 inhibitors], mTOR catalytic site inhibitors [mTORC1/2 inhibitors] and AKT inhibitors) are currently in clinical testing.
Key Terms
- PI3K
Family of enzymes involved in many key cellular functions
- RTKs
Cell surface receptors for many hormones, growth factors and cytokines
Footnotes
For reprint orders, please contact reprints@future-science.com
Financial & competing interests disclosure
D Gerber receives research funding from ArQule Inc., Boehringer-Ingelheim Inc., Genentech Inc. and Peregrine Pharmaceuticals. D Gerber also recieves funding from NIH CTSA Grant KL2RR024983 (North and Central Texas Clinical and Translational Science Initiative) and NCI Clinical Investigator Team Leadership Award (1P30 CA142543–01 supplement). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
References
- 1.Sugimoto Y, Whitman M, Cantley LC, Erikson RL. Evidence that the Rous sarcoma virus transforming gene product phosphorylates phosphatidylinositol and diacylglycerol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81(7):2117–2121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.2117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Whitman M, Kaplan D, Roberts T, Cantley L. Evidence for two distinct phosphatidylinositol kinases in fibroblasts. Implications for cellular regulation. Biochem J. 1987;247(1):165–174. doi: 10.1042/bj2470165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Whitman M, Downes CP, Keeler M, Keller T, Cantley L. Type I phosphatidylinositol kinase makes a novel inositol phospholipid, phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate. Nature. 1988;332(6165):644–646. doi: 10.1038/332644a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7(8):606–619. doi: 10.1038/nrg1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vivanco I, Sawyers CL. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(7):489–501. doi: 10.1038/nrc839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vanhaesebroeck B, Leevers SJ, Panayotou G, Waterfield MD. Phosphoinositide 3-kinases: a conserved family of signal transducers. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997;22(7):267–272. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01061-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vanhaesebroeck B, Guillermet-Guibert J, Graupera M, Bilanges B. The emerging mechanisms of isoform-specific PI3K signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(5):329–341. doi: 10.1038/nrm2882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fransson S, Uv A, Eriksson H, et al. p37delta is a new isoform of PI3K p110delta that increases cell proliferation and is overexpressed in tumors. Oncogene. 2011 doi: 10.1038/onc.492. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yuan TL, Cantley LC. PI3K pathway alterations in cancer: variations on a theme. Oncogene. 2008;27(41):5497–5510. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Engelman JA. Targeting PI3K signalling in cancer: opportunities, challenges and limitations. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(8):550–562. doi: 10.1038/nrc2664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kok K, Geering B, Vanhaesebroeck B. Regulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase expression in health and disease. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34(3):115–127. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vanhaesebroeck B, Welham MJ, Kotani K, et al. P110delta, a novel phosphoinositide 3-kinase in leukocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(9):4330–4335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Voigt P, Dorner MB, Schaefer M. Characterization of p87PIKAP, a novel regulatory subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ that is highly expressed in heart and interacts with PDE3B. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(15):9977–9986. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512502200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kurig B, Shymanets A, Bohnacker T, et al. Ras is an indispensable coregulator of the class IB phosphoinositide 3-kinase p87/p110γ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(48):20312–20317. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905506106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Katso R, Okkenhaug K, Ahmadi K, White S, Timms J, Waterfield MD. Cellular function of phosphoinositide 3-kinases: implications for development, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001;17:615–675. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Odorizzi G, Babst M, Emr SD. Phosphoinositide signaling and the regulation of membrane trafficking in yeast. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000;25(5):229–235. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01543-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yan Y, Flinn RJ, Wu H, Schnur RS, Backer JM. hVps15, but not Ca2+/CaM, is required for the activity and regulation of hVps34 in mammalian cells. Biochem J. 2009;417(3):747–755. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schu PV, Takegawa K, Fry MJ, Stack JH, Waterfield MD, Emr SD. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase encoded by yeast VPS34 gene essential for protein sorting. Science. 1993;260(5104):88–91. doi: 10.1126/science.8385367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vieira OV, Botelho RJ, Rameh L, et al. Distinct roles of class I and class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases in phagosome formation and maturation. J Cell Biol. 2001;155(1):19–25. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200107069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nobukuni T, Joaquin M, Roccio M, et al. Amino acids mediate mTOR/raptor signaling through activation of class 3 phosphatidylinositol 3OH-kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(40):14238–14243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506925102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Byfield MP, Murray JT, Backer JM. hVps34 is a nutrient-regulated lipid kinase required for activation of p70 S6 kinase. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(38):33076–33082. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M507201200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kihara A, Noda T, Ishihara N, Ohsumi Y. Two distinct Vps34 phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complexes function in autophagy and carboxypeptidase Y sorting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 2001;152(3):519–530. doi: 10.1083/jcb.152.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Simonsen A, Tooze SA. Coordination of membrane events during autophagy by multiple class III PI3-kinase complexes. J Cell Biol. 2009;186(6):773–782. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200907014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vanhaesebroeck B, Ali K, Bilancio A, Geering B, Foukas LC. Signalling by PI3K isoforms: insights from gene-targeted mice. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005;30(4):194–204. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gupta S, Ramjaun AR, Haiko P, et al. Binding of ras to phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110α is required for ras-driven tumorigenesis in mice. Cell. 2007;129(5):957–968. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Suire S, Condliffe AM, Ferguson GJ, et al. Gβ γs and the Ras binding domain of p110γ are both important regulators of PI(3)K γ signalling in neutrophils. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(11):1303–1309. doi: 10.1038/ncb1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rodriguez-Viciana P, Sabatier C, Mccormick F. Signaling specificity by Ras family GTPases is determined by the full spectrum of effectors they regulate. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(11):4943–4954. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.11.4943-4954.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Delgado P, Cubelos B, Calleja E, et al. Essential function for the GTPase TC21 in homeostatic antigen receptor signaling. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(8):880–888. doi: 10.1038/ni.1749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marques M, Kumar A, Cortes I, et al. Phosphoinositide 3-kinases p110 α and p110 β regulate cell cycle entry, exhibiting distinct activation kinetics in G1 phase. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28(8):2803–2814. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01786-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kang S, Denley A, Vanhaesebroeck B, Vogt PK. Oncogenic transformation induced by the p110-β, -γ, and -delta isoforms of class I phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(5):1289–1294. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510772103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jimenez C, Hernandez C, Pimentel B, Carrera AC. The p85 regulatory subunit controls sequential activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase by Tyr kinases and Ras. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(44):41556–41562. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205893200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stoyanov B, Volinia S, Hanck T, et al. Cloning and characterization of a G protein-activated human phosphoinositide-3 kinase. Science. 1995;269(5224):690–693. doi: 10.1126/science.7624799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guillermet-Guibert J, Bjorklof K, Salpekar A, et al. The p110 β isoform of phosphoinositide 3-kinase signals downstream of G protein-coupled receptors and is functionally redundant with p110γ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(24):8292–8297. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707761105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shin HW, Hayashi M, Christoforidis S, et al. An enzymatic cascade of Rab5 effectors regulates phosphoinositide turnover in the endocytic pathway. J Cell Biol. 2005;170(4):607–618. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200505128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kurosu H, Maehama T, Okada T, et al. Heterodimeric phosphoinositide 3-kinase consisting of p85 and p110β is synergistically activated by the βγ subunits of G proteins and phosphotyrosyl peptide. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(39):24252–24256. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.39.24252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Christoforidis S, Miaczynska M, Ashman K, et al. Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinases are Rab5 effectors. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1(4):249–252. doi: 10.1038/12075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bunney TD, Katan M. Phosphoinositide signalling in cancer: beyond PI3K and PTEN. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(5):342–352. doi: 10.1038/nrc2842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Agoulnik IU, Hodgson MC, Bowden WA, Ittmann MM. INPP4B: the new kid on the PI3K block. Oncotarget. 2011;2(4):321–328. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fedele CG, Ooms LM, Ho M, et al. Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase II regulates PI3K/Akt signaling and is lost in human basal-like breast cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(51):22231–22236. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015245107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gewinner C, Wang ZC, Richardson A, et al. Evidence that inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II is a tumor suppressor that inhibits PI3K signaling. Cancer Cell. 2009;16(2):115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sarbassov DD, Guertin DA, Ali SM, Sabatini DM. Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the rictor-mTOR complex. Science. 2005;307(5712):1098–1101. doi: 10.1126/science.1106148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hooshmand-Rad R, Hajkova L, Klint P, et al. The PI 3-kinase isoforms p110(α) and p110(β) have differential roles in PDGF- and insulin-mediated signaling. J Cell Sci. 2000;113(2):207–214. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.2.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Roche S, Downward J, Raynal P, Courtneidge SA. A function for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase β (p85α-p110β) in fibroblasts during mitogenesis: requirement for insulin- and lysophosphatidic acid-mediated signal transduction. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18(12):7119–7129. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.12.7119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Siddhanta U, McIlroy J, Shah A, Zhang Y, Backer JM. Distinct roles for the p110α and hVPS34 phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinases in vesicular trafficking, regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, and mitogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1998;143(6):1647–1659. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.6.1647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vanhaesebroeck B, Jones GE, Allen WE, et al. Distinct PI(3)Ks mediate mitogenic signalling and cell migration in macrophages. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1(1):69–71. doi: 10.1038/9045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Foukas LC, Claret M, Pearce W, et al. Critical role for the p110α phosphoinositide-3-OH kinase in growth and metabolic regulation. Nature. 2006;441(7091):366–370. doi: 10.1038/nature04694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bi L, Okabe I, Bernard DJ, Wynshaw-Boris A, Nussbaum RL. Proliferative defect and embryonic lethality in mice homozygous for a deletion in the p110α subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(16):10963–10968. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.16.10963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bi L, Okabe I, Bernard DJ, Nussbaum RL. Early embryonic lethality in mice deficient in the p110β catalytic subunit of PI 3-kinase. Mamm Genome. 2002;13(3):169–172. doi: 10.1007/BF02684023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Okkenhaug K, Bilancio A, Farjot G, et al. Impaired B and T cell antigen receptor signaling in p110delta PI 3-kinase mutant mice. Science. 2002;297(5583):1031–1034. doi: 10.1126/science.1073560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ali K, Bilancio A, Thomas M, et al. Essential role for the p110delta phosphoinositide 3-kinase in the allergic response. Nature. 2004;431(7011):1007–1011. doi: 10.1038/nature02991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hirsch E, Katanaev VL, Garlanda C, et al. Central role for G protein-coupled phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ in inflammation. Science. 2000;287(5455):1049–1053. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5455.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sasaki T, Irie-Sasaki J, Jones RG, et al. Function of PI3Kγ in thymocyte development, T cell activation, and neutrophil migration. Science. 2000;287(5455):1040–1046. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5455.1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Inukai K, Funaki M, Anai M, et al. Five isoforms of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase regulatory subunit exhibit different associations with receptor tyrosine kinases and their tyrosine phosphorylations. FEBS Lett. 2001;490(1–2):32–38. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02132-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Foukas LC, Berenjeno IM, Gray A, Khwaja A, Vanhaesebroeck B. Activity of any class IA PI3K isoform can sustain cell proliferation and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(25):11381–11386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906461107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hill KM, Kalifa S, Das JR, et al. The role of PI 3-kinase p110β in AKT signally, cell survival, and proliferation in human prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 2010;70(7):755–764. doi: 10.1002/pros.21108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Benistant C, Chapuis H, Roche S. A specific function for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase α (p85α-p110α) in cell survival and for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase β (p85α-p110β) in de novo DNA synthesis of human colon carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2000;19(44):5083–5090. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hickey FB, Cotter TG. BCR-ABL regulates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-p110γ transcription and activation and is required for proliferation and drug resistance. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(5):2441–2450. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511173200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sujobert P, Bardet V, Cornillet-Lefebvre P, et al. Essential role for the p110delta isoform in phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation and cell proliferation in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2005;106(3):1063–1066. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-08-3225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vasudevan KM, Barbie DA, Davies MA, et al. AKT-independent signaling downstream of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations in human cancer. Cancer Cell. 2009;16(1):21–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Inoki K, Li Y, Xu T, Guan KL. Rheb GTPase is a direct target of TSC2 GAP activity and regulates mTOR signaling. Genes Dev. 2003;17(15):1829–1834. doi: 10.1101/gad.1110003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tee AR, Fingar DC, Manning BD, Kwiatkowski DJ, Cantley LC, Blenis J. Tuberous sclerosis complex-1 and -2 gene products function together to inhibit mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated downstream signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(21):13571–13576. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202476899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fingar DC, Salama S, Tsou C, Harlow E, Blenis J. Mammalian cell size is controlled by mTOR and its downstream targets S6K1 and 4EBP1/eIF4E. Genes Dev. 2002;16(12):1472–1487. doi: 10.1101/gad.995802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.O’Reilly KE, Rojo F, She QB, et al. mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates Akt. Cancer Res. 2006;66(3):1500–1508. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Manning BD. Balancing Akt with S6K: implications for both metabolic diseases and tumorigenesis. J Cell Biol. 2004;167(3):399–403. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200408161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Thong FS, Dugani CB, Klip A. Turning signals on and off: GLUT4 traffic in the insulin-signaling highway. Physiology (Bethesda) 2005;20(4):271–284. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00017.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Luo J, Sobkiw CL, Hirshman MF, et al. Loss of class IA PI3K signaling in muscle leads to impaired muscle growth, insulin response, and hyperlipidemia. Cell Metab. 2006;3(5):355–366. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Cho H, Mu J, Kim JK, et al. Insulin resistance and a diabetes mellitus-like syndrome in mice lacking the protein kinase Akt2 (PKB β) Science. 2001;292(5522):1728–1731. doi: 10.1126/science.292.5522.1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Brunet A, Bonni A, Zigmond MJ, et al. Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor. Cell. 1999;96(6):857–868. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80595-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Duronio V. The life of a cell: apoptosis regulation by the PI3K/PKB pathway. Biochem J. 2008;415(3):333–344. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ozes ON, Mayo LD, Gustin JA, Pfeffer SR, Pfeffer LM, Donner DB. NF-κB activation by tumour necrosis factor requires the Akt serine-threonine kinase. Nature. 1999;401(6748):82–85. doi: 10.1038/43466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mayo LD, Dixon JE, Durden DL, Tonks NK, Donner DB. PTEN protects p53 from Mdm2 and sensitizes cancer cells to chemotherapy. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(7):5484–5489. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108302200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mayo LD, Donner DB. A phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway promotes translocation of Mdm2 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(20):11598–11603. doi: 10.1073/pnas.181181198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Zhou BP, Liao Y, Xia W, Zou Y, Spohn B, Hung MC. HER-2/neu induces p53 ubiquitination via Akt-mediated MDM2 phosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(11):973–982. doi: 10.1038/ncb1101-973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gardai SJ, Hildeman DA, Frankel SK, et al. Phosphorylation of Bax Ser184 by Akt regulates its activity and apoptosis in neutrophils. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(20):21085–21095. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400063200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Datta SR, Dudek H, Tao X, et al. Akt phosphorylation of BAD couples survival signals to the cell-intrinsic death machinery. Cell. 1997;91(2):231–241. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80405-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Del Peso L, Gonzalez-Garcia M, Page C, Herrera R, Nunez G. Interleukin-3-induced phosphorylation of BAD through the protein kinase Akt. Science. 1997;278(5338):687–689. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5338.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ekert PG, Jabbour AM, Manoharan A, et al. Cell death provoked by loss of interleukin-3 signaling is independent of Bad, Bim, and PI3 kinase, but depends in part on Puma. Blood. 2006;108(5):1461–1468. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-014209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hinton HJ, Welham MJ. Cytokine-induced protein kinase B activation and Bad phosphorylation do not correlate with cell survival of hemopoietic cells. J Immunol. 1999;162(12):7002–7009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Diehl JA, Cheng M, Roussel MF, Sherr CJ. Glycogen synthase kinase-3β regulates cyclin D1 proteolysis and subcellular localization. Genes Dev. 1998;12(22):3499–3511. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.22.3499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Mirza AM, Gysin S, Malek N, Nakayama K, Roberts JM, McMahon M. Cooperative regulation of the cell division cycle by the protein kinases RAF and AKT. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(24):10868–10881. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.24.10868-10881.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Medema RH, Kops GJ, Bos JL, Burgering BM. AFX-like Forkhead transcription factors mediate cell-cycle regulation by Ras and PKB through p27kip1. Nature. 2000;404(6779):782–787. doi: 10.1038/35008115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Jiang BH, Zheng JZ, Aoki M, Vogt PK. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling mediates angiogenesis and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(4):1749–1753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040560897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Graupera M, Guillermet-Guibert J, Foukas LC, et al. Angiogenesis selectively requires the p110α isoform of PI3K to control endothelial cell migration. Nature. 2008;453(7195):662–666. doi: 10.1038/nature06892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Forsythe JA, Jiang BH, Iyer NV, et al. Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16(9):4604–4613. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.9.4604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zhong H, Chiles K, Feldser D, et al. Modulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression by the epidermal growth factor/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/PTEN/AKT/FRAP pathway in human prostate cancer cells: implications for tumor angiogenesis and therapeutics. Cancer Res. 2000;60(6):1541–1545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Choi SB, Park JB, Song TJ, Choi SY. Molecular mechanism of HIF-1-independent VEGF expression in a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line. Int J Mol Med. 2011;28(3):449–454. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2011.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Defatta RJ, Nathan CO, De Benedetti A. Antisense RNA to eIF4E suppresses oncogenic properties of a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(6):928–933. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200006000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Brugarolas JB, Vazquez F, Reddy A, Sellers WR, Kaelin WG., Jr TSC2 regulates VEGF through mTOR-dependent and -independent pathways. Cancer Cell. 2003;4(2):147–158. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00187-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Babaei S, Teichert-Kuliszewska K, Zhang Q, Jones N, Dumont DJ, Stewart DJ. Angiogenic actions of angiopoietin-1 require endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Am J Pathol. 2003;162(6):1927–1936. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64326-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kim D, Kim S, Koh H, et al. Akt/PKB promotes cancer cell invasion via increased motility and metalloproteinase production. FASEB J. 2001;15(11):1953–1962. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0198com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Shukla S, Maclennan GT, Hartman DJ, Fu P, Resnick MI, Gupta S. Activation of PI3K-Akt signaling pathway promotes prostate cancer cell invasion. Int J Cancer. 2007;121(7):1424–1432. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chen JS, Wang Q, Fu XH, et al. Involvement of PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway in invasion and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma: Association with MMP-9. Hepatol Res. 2009;39(2):177–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2008.00449.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Gulhati P, Bowen KA, Liu J, et al. mTORC1 and mTORC2 regulate EMT, motility, and metastasis of colorectal cancer via RhoA and Rac1 signaling pathways. Cancer Res. 2011;71(9):3246–3256. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Tkach V, Bock E, Berezin V. The role of RhoA in the regulation of cell morphology and motility. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2005;61(1):21–33. doi: 10.1002/cm.20062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Jaffe AB, Hall A. Rho GTPases in transformation and metastasis. Adv Cancer Res. 2002;84:57–80. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(02)84003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Knowles JA, Golden B, Yan L, Carroll WR, Helman EE, Rosenthal EL. Disruption of the AKT pathway inhibits metastasis in an orthotopic model of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(11):2359–2365. doi: 10.1002/lary.22180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(5):339–346. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Samuels Y, Velculescu VE. Oncogenic mutations of PIK3CA in human cancers. Cell Cycle. 2004;3(10):1221–1224. doi: 10.4161/cc.3.10.1164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Vogt PK, Kang S, Elsliger MA, Gymnopoulos M. Cancer-specific mutations in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Trends Biochem Sci. 2007;32(7):342–349. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Bader AG, Kang S, Zhao L, Vogt PK. Oncogenic PI3K deregulates transcription and translation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(12):921–929. doi: 10.1038/nrc1753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zhao L, Vogt PK. Class I PI3K in oncogenic cellular transformation. Oncogene. 2008;27(41):5486–5496. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Okudela K, Suzuki M, Kageyama S, et al. PIK3CA mutation and amplification in human lung cancer. Pathol Int. 2007;57(10):664–671. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2007.02155.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Garcia JM, Silva J, Pena C, et al. Promoter methylation of the PTEN gene is a common molecular change in breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2004;41(2):117–124. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Carracedo A, Pandolfi PP. The PTEN-PI3K pathway: of feedbacks and cross-talks. Oncogene. 2008;27(41):5527–5541. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Cornejo MG, Mabialah V, Sykes SM, et al. Crosstalk between NOTCH and AKT signaling during murine megakaryocyte lineage specification. Blood. 2011;118(5):1264–1273. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-328567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Moreno CS. The Sex-determining region Y-box 4 and homeobox C6 transcriptional networks in prostate cancer progression: crosstalk with the Wnt, Notch, and PI3K pathways. Am J Pathol. 2010;176(2):518–527. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Byun JY, Kim MJ, Yoon CH, Cha H, Yoon G, Lee SJ. Oncogenic Ras signals through activation of both phosphoinositide 3-kinase and Rac1 to induce c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase-mediated, caspase-independent cell death. Mol Cancer Res. 2009;7(9):1534–1542. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Ma L, Chen Z, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Pandolfi PP. Phosphorylation and functional inactivation of TSC2 by Erk implications for tuberous sclerosis and cancer pathogenesis. Cell. 2005;121(2):179–193. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Massarweh S, Schiff R. Unraveling the mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer: new therapeutic opportunities. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(7):1950–1954. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Campbell RA, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Patel NM, Constantinidou D, Ali S, Nakshatri H. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT-mediated activation of estrogen receptor α: a new model for anti-estrogen resistance. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(13):9817–9824. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010840200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Beeram M, Tan QT, Tekmal RR, Russell D, Middleton A, Degraffenried LA. Akt-induced endocrine therapy resistance is reversed by inhibition of mTOR signaling. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(8):1323–1328. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Degraffenried LA, Friedrichs WE, Russell DH, et al. Inhibition of mTOR activity restores tamoxifen response in breast cancer cells with aberrant Akt Activity. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(23):8059–8067. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Baselga J, Semiglazov V, Van Dam P, et al. Phase II randomized study of neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole compared with placebo plus letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(16):2630–2637. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.8391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Berns K, Horlings HM, Hennessy BT, et al. A functional genetic approach identifies the PI3K pathway as a major determinant of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2007;12(4):395–402. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Nagata Y, Lan KH, Zhou X, et al. PTEN activation contributes to tumor inhibition by trastuzumab, and loss of PTEN predicts trastuzumab resistance in patients. Cancer Cell. 2004;6(2):117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Eichhorn PJ, Gili M, Scaltriti M, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase hyperactivation results in lapatinib resistance that is reversed by the mTOR/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor NVP-BEZ235. Cancer Res. 2008;68(22):9221–9230. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Dave B, Migliaccio I, Gutierrez MC, et al. Loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog or phosphoinositol-3 kinase activation and response to trastuzumab or lapatinib in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing locally advanced breast cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(2):166–173. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.7814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Wang L, Zhang Q, Zhang J, et al. PI3K pathway activation results in low efficacy of both trastuzumab and lapatinib. BMC Cancer. 2011 doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Li SY, Rong M, Grieu F, Iacopetta B. PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer are associated with poor outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;96(1):91–95. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9048-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Capodanno A, Camerini A, Orlandini C, et al. Dysregulated PI3K/Akt/PTEN pathway is a marker of a short disease-free survival in node-negative breast carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2009;40(10):1408–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Woenckhaus J, Steger K, Sturm K, Munstedt K, Franke FE, Fenic I. Prognostic value of PIK3CA and phosphorylated AKT expression in ovarian cancer. Virchows Arch. 2007;450(4):387–395. doi: 10.1007/s00428-006-0358-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Kolasa IK, Rembiszewska A, Felisiak A, et al. PIK3CA amplification associates with resistance to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009;8(1):21–26. doi: 10.4161/cbt.8.1.7209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Salvesen HB, Carter SL, Mannelqvist M, et al. Integrated genomic profiling of endometrial carcinoma associates aggressive tumors with indicators of PI3 kinase activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(12):4834–4839. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806514106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Farina Sarasqueta A, Zeestraten EC, Van Wezel T, et al. PIK3CA kinase domain mutation identifies a subgroup of stage III colon cancer patients with poor prognosis. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2011;34(6):523–531. doi: 10.1007/s13402-011-0054-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Ludovini V, Bianconi F, Pistola L, et al. Phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic α and KRAS mutations are important predictors of resistance to therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(4):707–715. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31820a3a6b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Sos ML, Koker M, Weir BA, et al. PTEN loss contributes to erlotinib resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer by activation of Akt and EGFR. Cancer Res. 2009;69(8):3256–3261. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Pu X, Hildebrandt MA, Lu C, et al. PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway genetic variation predicts toxicity and distant progression in lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. Lung Cancer. 2011;71(1):82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Hirami Y, Aoe M, Tsukuda K, et al. Relation of epidermal growth factor receptor, phosphorylated-Akt, and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Lett. 2004;214(2):157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Schuurbiers OC, Kaanders JH, Van Der Heijden HF, Dekhuijzen RP, Oyen WJ, Bussink J. The PI3-K/AKT-pathway and radiation resistance mechanisms in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4(6):761–767. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a1084f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Grana B, Burris HA, Rodon Ahnert J, et al. Oral PI3 kinase inhibitor BKM120 monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: an update on safety and efficacy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(Suppl):Abstract 3043. [Google Scholar]
- 131.Coutre SE, Byrd JC, Furman RR, et al. Phase I study of CAL-101, an isoform-selective inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase P110d, in patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(Suppl):Abstr. 6631. [Google Scholar]
- 132.Flinn IW, Schreeder MT, Coutre SE, et al. A Phase I study of CAL-101, an isoform-selective inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase P110δ, in combination with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy and/or bendamustine in patients with previously treated B-cell malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(Suppl):Abstr. 3064. [Google Scholar]
- 133.Brunn GJ, Williams J, Sabers C, Wiederrecht G, Lawrence JC, Jr, Abraham RT. Direct inhibition of the signaling functions of the mammalian target of rapamycin by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, wortmannin and LY294002. EMBO J. 1996;15(19):5256–5267. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Peyton JD, Rodon Ahnert J, Burris H, et al. A dose-escalation study with the novel formulation of the oral pan-class I PI3K inhibitor BEZ235, solid dispersion system (SDS) sachet, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(Suppl):Abstr. 3066. [Google Scholar]
- 135.Abraham RT, Gibbons JJ. The mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway: twists and turns in the road to cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(11):3109–3114. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, Kim DH, et al. Rictor, a novel binding partner of mTOR, defines a rapamycin-insensitive and raptor-independent pathway that regulates the cytoskeleton. Curr Biol. 2004;14(14):1296–1302. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Jacinto E, Loewith R, Schmidt A, et al. Mammalian TOR complex 2 controls the actin cytoskeleton and is rapamycin insensitive. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6(11):1122–1128. doi: 10.1038/ncb1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Dancey JE, Monzon J. Ridaforolimus: a promising drug in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma and other malignancies. Future Oncol. 2011;7(7):827–839. doi: 10.2217/fon.11.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Chawla SP, Blay J, Ray-Coquard IL, et al. Results of the Phase III, placebo-controlled trial (SUCCEED) evaluating the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus (R) as maintenance therapy in advanced sarcoma patients (pts) following clinical benefit from prior standard cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT) J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(Suppl):Abstr. 10005. [Google Scholar]
- 140.Tan DS, Dumez H, Olmos D, et al. First-in-human Phase I study exploring three schedules of OSI-027, a novel small molecule TORC1/TORC2 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15s)(Suppl):Abstr. 3006. [Google Scholar]
- 141.Cheng JQ, Lindsley CW, Cheng GZ, Yang H, Nicosia SV. The Akt/PKB pathway: molecular target for cancer drug discovery. Oncogene. 2005;24(50):7482–7492. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Yap TA, Patnaik A, Fearen I, et al. First-in-class Phase I trial of a selective Akt inhibitor, MK2206 (MK), evaluating alternate day (QOD) and once weekly (QW) doses in advanced cancer patients (pts) with evidence of target modulation and antitumor activity. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(Suppl. Abstr. 15):3009. [Google Scholar]
- 143.Inukai K, Funaki M, Ogihara T, et al. p85α gene generates three isoforms of regulatory subunit for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-Kinase), p50α, p55α, and p85α, with different PI 3-kinase activity elevating responses to insulin. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(12):7873–7882. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.12.7873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Inukai K, Anai M, Van Breda E, et al. A novel 55-kDa regulatory subunit for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase structurally similar to p55PIK Is generated by alternative splicing of the p85α gene. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(10):5317–5320. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.10.5317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Hu P, Mondino A, Skolnik EY, Schlessinger J. Cloning of a novel, ubiquitously expressed human phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and identification of its binding site on p85. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13(12):7677–7688. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.12.7677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Suire S, Coadwell J, Ferguson GJ, Davidson K, Hawkins P, Stephens L. p84, a new Gβγ-activated regulatory subunit of the type IB phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110γ. Curr Biol. 2005;15(6):566–570. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Domin J, Pages F, Volinia S, et al. Cloning of a human phosphoinositide 3-kinase with a C2 domain that displays reduced sensitivity to the inhibitor wortmannin. Biochem J. 1997;326(1):139–147. doi: 10.1042/bj3260139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Brown RA, Ho LK, Weber-Hall SJ, Shipley JM, Fry MJ. Identification and cDNA cloning of a novel mammalian C2 domain-containing phosphoinositide 3-kinase, HsC2-PI3K. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;233(2):537–544. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Rozycka M, Lu YJ, Brown RA, Lau MR, Shipley JM, Fry MJ. cDNA cloning of a third human C2-domain-containing class II phosphoinositide 3-kinase, PI3K-C2γ, and chromosomal assignment of this gene (PIK3C2G) to 12p12. Genomics. 1998;54(3):569–574. doi: 10.1006/geno.1998.5621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Panaretou C, Domin J, Cockcroft S, Waterfield MD. Characterization of p150, an adaptor protein for the human phosphatidylinositol (PtdIns) 3-kinase. Substrate presentation by phosphatidylinositol transfer protein to the p150.Ptdins 3-kinase complex. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(4):2477–2485. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.4.2477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Volinia S, Dhand R, Vanhaesebroeck B, et al. A human phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex related to the yeast Vps34p-Vps15p protein sorting system. EMBO J. 1995;14(14):3339–3348. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07340.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Wu G, Xing M, Mambo E, et al. Somatic mutation and gain of copy number of PIK3CA in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(5):R609–616. doi: 10.1186/bcr1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Levine DA, Bogomolniy F, Yee CJ, et al. Frequent mutation of the PIK3CA gene in ovarian and breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(8):2875–2878. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Bachman KE, Argani P, Samuels Y, et al. The PIK3CA gene is mutated with high frequency in human breast cancers. Cancer Biol Ther. 2004;3(8):772–775. doi: 10.4161/cbt.3.8.994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Rudd ML, Price JC, Fogoros S, et al. A unique spectrum of somatic PIK3CA (p110α) mutations within primary endometrial carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(6):1331–1340. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Broderick DK, Di C, Parrett TJ, et al. Mutations of PIK3CA in anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, high-grade astrocytomas, and medulloblastomas. Cancer Res. 2004;64(15):5048–5050. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Campbell IG, Russell SE, Choong DY, et al. Mutation of the PIK3CA gene in ovarian and breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64(21):7678–7681. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Pedrero JM, Carracedo DG, Pinto CM, et al. Frequent genetic and biochemical alterations of the PI 3-K/AKT/PTEN pathway in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2005;114(2):242–248. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Racz A, Brass N, Heckel D, Pahl S, Remberger K, Meese E. Expression analysis of genes at 3q26-q27 involved in frequent amplification in squamous cell lung carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35(4):641–646. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00419-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Ma YY, Wei SJ, Lin YC, et al. PIK3CA as an oncogene in cervical cancer. Oncogene. 2000;19(23):2739–2744. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Byun DS, Cho K, Ryu BK, et al. Frequent monoallelic deletion of PTEN and its reciprocal associatioin with PIK3CA amplification in gastric carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2003;104(3):318–327. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Miller CT, Moy JR, Lin L, et al. Gene amplification in esophageal adenocarcinomas and Barrett’s with high-grade dysplasia. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(13):4819–4825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Wu G, Mambo E, Guo Z, et al. Uncommon mutation, but common amplifications, of the PIK3CA gene in thyroid tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(8):4688–4693. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Sun X, Huang J, Homma T, et al. Genetic alterations in the PI3K pathway in prostate cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(5):1739–1743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Mizoguchi M, Nutt CL, Mohapatra G, Louis DN. Genetic alterations of phosphoinositide 3-kinase subunit genes in human glioblastomas. Brain Pathol. 2004;14(4):372–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00080.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature. 2008;455(7216):1061–1068. doi: 10.1038/nature07385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Philp AJ, Campbell IG, Leet C, et al. The phosphatidylinositol 3’-kinase p85α gene is an oncogene in human ovarian and colon tumors. Cancer Res. 2001;61(20):7426–7429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Urick ME, Rudd ML, Godwin AK, Sgroi D, Merino M, Bell DW. PIK3R1 (p85α) is somatically mutated at high frequency in primary endometrial cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71(12):4061–4067. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Liaw D, Marsh DJ, Li J, et al. Germline mutations of the PTEN gene in Cowden disease, an inherited breast and thyroid cancer syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;16(1):64–67. doi: 10.1038/ng0597-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Tashiro H, Blazes MS, Wu R, et al. Mutations in PTEN are frequent in endometrial carcinoma but rare in other common gynecological malignancies. Cancer Res. 1997;57(18):3935–3940. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, et al. PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science. 1997;275(5308):1943–1947. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5308.1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Wiencke JK, Zheng S, Jelluma N, et al. Methylation of the PTEN promoter defines low-grade gliomas and secondary glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2007;9(3):271–279. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2007-003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Whang YE, Wu X, Suzuki H, et al. Inactivation of the tumor suppressor PTEN/MMAC1 in advanced human prostate cancer through loss of expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(9):5246–5250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Mirmohammadsadegh A, Marini A, Nambiar S, et al. Epigenetic silencing of the PTEN gene in melanoma. Cancer Res. 2006;66(13):6546–6552. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Lahtz C, Stranzenbach R, Fiedler E, Helmbold P, Dammann RH. Methylation of PTEN as a prognostic factor in malignant melanoma of the skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(2):620–622. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Kang YH, Lee HS, Kim WH. Promoter methylation and silencing of PTEN in gastric carcinoma. Lab Invest. 2002;82(3):285–291. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Goel A, Arnold CN, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Frequent inactivation of PTEN by promoter hypermethylation in microsatellite instability – high sporadic colorectal cancers. Cancer Res. 2004;64(9):3014–3021. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-2401-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Salvesen HB, Macdonald N, Ryan A, et al. PTEN methylation is associated with advanced stage and microsatellite instability in endometrial carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2001;91(1):22–26. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20010101)91:1<22::aid-ijc1002>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Soria JC, Lee HY, Lee JI, et al. Lack of PTEN expression in non-small cell lung cancer could be related to promoter methylation. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8(5):1178–1184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Ohgaki H, Dessen P, Jourde B, et al. Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res. 2004;64(19):6892–6899. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Cairns P, Okami K, Halachmi S, et al. Frequent inactivation of PTEN/MMAC1 in primary prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1997;57(22):4997–5000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Carpten JD, Faber AL, Horn C, et al. A transforming mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 in cancer. Nature. 2007;448(7152):439–444. doi: 10.1038/nature05933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Kim MS, Jeong EG, Yoo NJ, Lee SH. Mutational analysis of oncogenic AKT E17K mutation in common solid cancers and acute leukaemias. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(9):1533–1535. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Malanga D, Scrima M, De Marco C, et al. Activating E17K mutation in the gene encoding the protein kinase AKT1 in a subset of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(5):665–669. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.5.5485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Shoji K, Oda K, Nakagawa S, et al. The oncogenic mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 in endometrial carcinomas. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(1):145–148. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Staal SP. Molecular cloning of the akt oncogene and its human homologues AKT1 and AKT2: amplification of AKT1 in a primary human gastric adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84(14):5034–5037. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.14.5034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Parsons DW, Wang TL, Samuels Y, et al. Colorectal cancer: mutations in a signalling pathway. Nature. 2005;436(7052):792. doi: 10.1038/436792a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Cheng JQ, Ruggeri B, Klein WM, et al. Amplification of AKT2 in human pancreatic cells and inhibition of AKT2 expression and tumorigenicity by antisense RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93(8):3636–3641. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Ruggeri BA, Huang L, Wood M, Cheng JQ, Testa JR. Amplification and overexpression of the AKT2 oncogene in a subset of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Mol Carcinog. 1998;21(2):81–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Cheng JQ, Godwin AK, Bellacosa A, et al. AKT2, a putative oncogene encoding a member of a subfamily of protein-serine/threonine kinases, is amplified in human ovarian carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89(19):9267–9271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.9267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Bellacosa A, De Feo D, Godwin AK, et al. Molecular alterations of the AKT2 oncogene in ovarian and breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 1995;64(4):280–285. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910640412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Arranz E, Robledo M, Martinez B, et al. Incidence of homogeneously staining regions in non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1996;87(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(95)00230-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Davies MA, Stemke-Hale K, Tellez C, et al. A novel AKT3 mutation in melanoma tumours and cell lines. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(8):1265–1268. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Websites
- 201.Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. Catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer – COSMIC. www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP/cosmic.
- 202.ClinicalTrials.gov. Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BKM120 plus MEK162 in selected advanced solid tumor patients. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01363232.
- 203.ClinicalTrials.gov. www.ClinicalTrials.gov.

