Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Probl. 2014 Nov;61(4):602–624. doi: 10.1525/sp.2014.12255

Table 5.

Selected Results from Multilevel Models Predicting Wave II College Preparatory Coursework

B (SE)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Focal Main Effects
 Wave I college preparatory index .60***
(.01)
.60***
(.01)
.50***
(.01)
 Parent education (college graduate) .10***
(.02)
.88**
(.30)
−1.60*
(.61)
 Wave I grade level −.26***
(.02)
−.23***
(.03)
−.33**
(.03)
 Prop. coursemates with college-educated parents .03
(.08)
.08
(.63)
−1.12
(.90)
Two-Way Interactions
 Parent education × grade level −.09**
(.03)
−.16*
(.06)
 Coursemates × grade level −.01
(.06)
.12
(.09)
 Parent education × coursemates .15
(.11)
4.86**
(1.38)
Three-Way Interaction
 Parent education × coursemates × grade −.47**
(.13)
 Intercept 3.02***
(.39)
2.78***
(.44)
3.60***
(.48)

n = 7,481 (students), 72 (schools)

Δ −2 Res Log Likelihood = −1 (Model 1 vs. 2), −746 (Model 2 vs. 3)

Note: Both models included a random intercept to account for cross-school variation in the outcome. Both models controlled for full set of family, sociodemographic, and school factors (family income to needs, family structure, gender, race/ethnicity, immigration status, school mean parent education level, school mean g.p.a., proportion of seniors in school in college track, school enrollment based on testing, school use of tracking, and school math/science academy status). PVT score and Wave I g.p.a. were also controlled.