Table 4. Trends in Bystander CPR and AED Use.
Rates of both bystander CPR and lay person deployment of AEDs increased during the study period.
| 2005-2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | P for trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Person performing CPR | <0.001 | |||||||
| Bystander | 28.2% | 33.1% | 33.8% | 31.6% | 31.8% | 36.7% | 36.3% | |
| First responder | 35.1% | 32.1% | 35.0% | 36.4% | 38.1% | 26.5% | 29.3% | |
| EMS personnel | 36.7% | 34.8% | 31.2% | 32.0% | 30.1% | 36.8% | 34.4% | |
| Bystander AED use* | ||||||||
| All Arrests | 1.9% (18/946) | 2.3% (49/2173) | 3.7% (138/3686) | 3.5% (210/6021) | 3.6% (298/8270) | 4.5% (493/10,853) | 4.2% (692/16,614) | <0.001 |
| Witnessed arrests | 6.5% (14/217) | 5.6% (27/481) | 9.2% (78/847) | 9.1% (122/1340) | 10.3% (183/1784) | 9.5% (259/2719) | 9.4% (398/4224) | 0.048 |
Abbreviation: AED, automated external defibrillator; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; EMS, emergency medical services
By convention, for calculations of bystander AED use, we excluded from consideration patients with a witnessed arrest for whom CPR was initiated by a first responder (police, firemen) or EMS personnel, as bystanders would not be expected to deploy an AED in these circumstances