Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2015 Sep;47(3):736–743. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0497-4

Table 2.

Group level analysis and split-half reliability in each of the five studies. Note that as we only had one data set from subjects in Expt. 5, we do not report split half reliability. Holistic processing is calculated as the interaction between congruency and alignment.

Stimulus Set Subjects Included Holistic processing (Δd′, σ) p-Value Effect size (eta2partial) Split-Half Subtraction Split-Half Regression
Expt 1.
MPI female 76/85 0.30 (0.96) <.05 0.09 0.05 0.13
G&R 77/85 0.53 (0.98) <.05 0.22
Expt 2.
MPI female 60/67 0.53 (1.00) <.05 0.21 0.04 0.11
MPI female 60/67 0.90 (0.84) <.05 0.53
Expt 3.
MPI female 89/91 0.58 (0.86) <.05 0.31 0 0.15
G&R 86/91 0.81 (0.89) <.05 0.46
Expt 4.
MPI female 52/53 0.18 (1.20) > .05 0.02 0 0.12
MPI male 50/53 0.52 (0.81) < .05 0.29
Expt 5.
MPI female 40/53 0.86 (0.93) < .05 0.46