Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun;70(6):3528–3534. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.6.3528-3534.2004

TABLE 1.

Number of libraries analyzed, total clones screened, and percentage of clones affiliating with unknown or known groupsa

Marine system No. of libraries Total no. of clones % of clones within:
Source or reference
Unknown groups
Known groups
Novel stramenopiles Novel alveolates Other Phototrophic Heterotrophic (BHS)
Open Sea
    North Atlantic 2 37 18.9 18.9 0 48.6 13.5 (0) 9
    Mediterranean 1 63 19.0 19.0 0 47.6 14.3 (0) 9
    Pacific 1 37 18.9 16.2 0 51.4 13.5 (0) 34
    Antarctica 2 125 27.2 0 3.2 59.2 10.4 (0) 9
Coast
    Orkney 1 81 17.3 6.2 6.2 14.8 55.6 (0) This study
    Helgoland 6 633 4.7 46.8 0.6 26.7 21.1 (1.6) This study
    Roscoff 8 367 11.7 16.3 3.8 36.2 31.9 (2.5) This study
    Blanes Bay 4 339 10.0 41.0 0.9 35.1 10.3 (2.7) This study
Anoxic
    Shallow sediments 2 74 14.9 0 33.8 10.8 40.5 (2.7) 7
    Hydrothermal vents 7 269 6.3 18.2 11.5 19.7 44.2 (16.4) 11
    Salt marshes 3 76 0 0 9.2 43.4 47.4 (1.3) 42
a

Known groups were separated into those containing mostly phototrophic or heterotrophic organisms. BHS, basal heterotrophic stramenopiles. Deep Antarctic libraries (28) are not included in the table because they were not quantitatively analyzed. The analysis of shallow sediments and salt marshes is semiquantitative (does not take into account the redundancy of identical clones). Metazoan clones have been excluded in all cases.