Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115969

Table 2. Concordance between the studied typing techniques using adjusted Wallace coefficient (95% confidence interval).

PFGE (cut-off 80%) rep-PCR (cut-off 95%) MLST blaOXA-51 SBT
PFGE 0.690 (0.313–1.000) 1.000 (1.000–1.000) 1.000 (1.000–1.000)
rep-PCR 0.462 (0.086–0.838) 0.815 (0.473–1.000) 0.672 (0.259–1.000)
MLST 0.422 (0.058–0.786) 0.513 (0.107–0.919) 0.847 (0.564–1.000)
blaOXA-51 SBT 0.498 (0.142–0.854) 0.499 (0.085–0.914) 1.000 (1.000–1.000)