Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 5;81(2):640–647. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02856-14

TABLE 3.

Effects of CMs on heterotrophic aerobic bacteria in naturally infected oysters

Expt no. CM treatment (%) Concn of heterotrophic aerobic bacteria in oysters (no. of mean log CFU/g ± SD)a
Pretreatment Day 1 Day 2
1 0.0 (control) 6.96 ± 0.13 6.91 ± 0.10 6.11 ± 0.30
0.1 4.68 ± 0.28b 4.33 ± 0.52b
0.3 4.32 ± 0.69b 3.89 ± 0.48b
0.5 4.27 ± 0.41b 2.75 ± 0.67c
2 0.0 (control) 5.69 ± 0.30 5.43 ± 0.23 5.31 ± 0.21
0.1 4.28 ± 0.33b 3.89 ± 0.27b
0.3 3.72 ± 0.27b 3.01 ± 0.31b
0.5 3.11 ± 0.43b 2.16 ± 0.30b
3 0.0 (control) 5.40 ± 0.47 4.83 ± 0.27 4.90 ± 0.36
0.1 3.93 ± 0.61b 3.66 ± 0.91
0.3 3.97 ± 0.39 3.41 ± 0.52b
0.5 3.63 ± 0.73b 3.49 ± 0.76b
a

The number of mean log CFU/g ± standard deviation (SD) based on plate counts on LA from three independent experiments with 3 oysters in the first two experiments and 6 oysters in the third experiment for a total of 12 oysters for each experimental condition and time point.

b

The reduction of the heterotrophic aerobic bacterial level from the initial level is <3.52 mean log CFU/g but is significantly different from the level for the control samples treated with 0.0% CMs, as determined by two-tailed, one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05).

c

The reduction of the heterotrophic aerobic bacterial level from the initial level is >3.52 mean log CFU/g and is significantly different from the level for the control samples treated with 0.0% CMs, as determined by two-tailed, one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05).