Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 Jan;203(1):65–70. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000224

Table 1.

Continuity of care outcomes after psychiatric hospital discharge.

9-Month Outcome Assessment
18-Month Outcome Assessment
USO
CTI
Group comparison
USO
CTI
Group comparison
n M Mdn P75 P25 n M Mdn P75 P25 χ2, z p n M Mdn P75 P25 n M Mdn P75 P25 χ2, z p
Perceived ease of access: 63 12.3 12.3 14.5 10.5 67 12.6 12.6 15 11 z = −0.78 0.45 50 11.9 12 14.2 10.3 57 12.8 12.8 14 11.33 z = −1.4 0.16
Change in provider (%):
 in psychiatrist 24 44% 18 30% χ2 = 2.3 0.13 19 40% 21 40% χ2 <0.01 1.00
 in case manager/therapist 22 41% 14 23% χ2 = 4.0 0.046 22 50% 23 46% χ2 = 0.2 0.70
Length of relationship (months):
 with same psychiatrist 49 6.9 9 9 2 49 8.0 9 9 4 z = −1.9 0.05 42 12.0 12 18 2 48 14.4 18 18 6 z = −1.6 0.11
 with same case manager 41 7.5 9 9 2 50 10.0 9 9 9 z = −2.3 0.02 39 11.2 8 18 2 47 11.4 8 18 3 z = −0.7 0.51
 with same therapist/counselor 19 7.1 9 9 4 25 10.0 9 9 2 z = −0.4 0.66 20 10.7 10.5 18 3 21 14.1 14 18 3 z = −0.1 0.96
Number of changes:
 in psychiatrist 20 2.8 2 5 1 17 2.7 2 3 2 z = −0.2 0.87 19 2.8 2 5 1 21 1.8 1 2 1 z = 1.8 0.07
 in case manager/therapist 15 2.8 2 4 1 14 3.1 3 4 1 z = −0.4 0.66 20 2.4 2 3 1 23 1.5 1 1 1 z = 2.5 0.01
Transition ratings:
 in psychiatrist 20 37.1 14.6 79 0 16 43.2 39.6 67 20.9 z = −0.8 0.44* 17 28.3 16.7 50 0 18 41.3 39.6 75 8 z = −1.00 0.32
 in case manager/therapist 18 31.8 28.1 63 0 14 39.4 45.8 58.3 0 z = −0.6 0.55 18 40.3 37.5 75 0 22 40.4 41.7 69 6 z = −0.2 0.84

Analyses conducted when there are change in service provider which explains smaller sample sub-population. Significance of adjusted quintile regression analyses

*

p≤0.05.

Higher rating is better COC