Table 1.
9-Month Outcome Assessment
|
18-Month Outcome Assessment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USO
|
CTI
|
Group comparison
|
USO
|
CTI
|
Group comparison
|
|||||||||||||||||||
n | M | Mdn | P75 | P25 | n | M | Mdn | P75 | P25 | χ2, z | p | n | M | Mdn | P75 | P25 | n | M | Mdn | P75 | P25 | χ2, z | p | |
Perceived ease of access‡: | 63 | 12.3 | 12.3 | 14.5 | 10.5 | 67 | 12.6 | 12.6 | 15 | 11 | z = −0.78 | 0.45 | 50 | 11.9 | 12 | 14.2 | 10.3 | 57 | 12.8 | 12.8 | 14 | 11.33 | z = −1.4 | 0.16 |
Change in provider (%): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
in psychiatrist | 24 | 44% | 18 | 30% | χ2 = 2.3 | 0.13 | 19 | 40% | 21 | 40% | χ2 <0.01 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
in case manager/therapist | 22 | 41% | 14 | 23% | χ2 = 4.0 | 0.046 | 22 | 50% | 23 | 46% | χ2 = 0.2 | 0.70 | ||||||||||||
Length of relationship (months): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
with same psychiatrist | 49 | 6.9 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 49 | 8.0 | 9 | 9 | 4 | z = −1.9 | 0.05 | 42 | 12.0 | 12 | 18 | 2 | 48 | 14.4 | 18 | 18 | 6 | z = −1.6 | 0.11 |
with same case manager | 41 | 7.5 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 50 | 10.0 | 9 | 9 | 9 | z = −2.3 | 0.02 | 39 | 11.2 | 8 | 18 | 2 | 47 | 11.4 | 8 | 18 | 3 | z = −0.7 | 0.51 |
with same therapist/counselor | 19 | 7.1 | 9 | 9 | 4 | 25 | 10.0 | 9 | 9 | 2 | z = −0.4 | 0.66 | 20 | 10.7 | 10.5 | 18 | 3 | 21 | 14.1 | 14 | 18 | 3 | z = −0.1 | 0.96 |
Number of changes†: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
in psychiatrist | 20 | 2.8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 17 | 2.7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | z = −0.2 | 0.87 | 19 | 2.8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 21 | 1.8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | z = 1.8 | 0.07 |
in case manager/therapist | 15 | 2.8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 3.1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | z = −0.4 | 0.66 | 20 | 2.4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 23 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | z = 2.5 | 0.01 |
Transition ratings†‡: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
in psychiatrist | 20 | 37.1 | 14.6 | 79 | 0 | 16 | 43.2 | 39.6 | 67 | 20.9 | z = −0.8 | 0.44* | 17 | 28.3 | 16.7 | 50 | 0 | 18 | 41.3 | 39.6 | 75 | 8 | z = −1.00 | 0.32 |
in case manager/therapist | 18 | 31.8 | 28.1 | 63 | 0 | 14 | 39.4 | 45.8 | 58.3 | 0 | z = −0.6 | 0.55 | 18 | 40.3 | 37.5 | 75 | 0 | 22 | 40.4 | 41.7 | 69 | 6 | z = −0.2 | 0.84 |
Analyses conducted when there are change in service provider which explains smaller sample sub-population. Significance of adjusted quintile regression analyses
p≤0.05.
Higher rating is better COC