Table 2. Correlation coefficient (r) between the different physio-biochemical parameters under various concentration of NaCl after 7 days of treatments.
PRO100 | PRO150 | PRO200 | OP100 | OP150 | OP200 | RWC100 | RWC150 | RWC200 | EC100 | EC150 | EC200 | CHL100 | CHL150 | |
PRO150 | 0.86** | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
PRO200 | 0.88** | 0.95** | 1.00 | |||||||||||
OP100 | 0.86** | 0.89** | 0.89** | 1.00 | ||||||||||
OP150 | 0.82** | 0.93** | 0.96** | 0.90** | 1.00 | |||||||||
OP200 | 0.90** | 0.81** | 0.92** | 0.81** | 0.87** | 1.00 | ||||||||
RWC100 | 0.54 | 0.82** | 0.77** | 0.84** | 0.85** | 0.59* | 1.00 | |||||||
RWC150 | 0.87** | 0.93** | 0.93** | 0.85** | 0.97** | 0.89** | 0.73** | 1.00 | ||||||
RWC200 | 0.64* | 0.81** | 0.78** | 0.66* | 0.89** | 0.69** | 0.67* | 0.90** | 1.00 | |||||
EC100 | −0.54 | −0.81* | −0.72** | −0.62* | −0.81** | −0.59 | −0.74** | −0.82** | −0.90** | 1.00 | ||||
EC150 | −0.44 | −0.75* | −0.73** | −0.51 | −0.78** | −0.62 | −0.68* | −0.79** | −0.83** | 0.89** | 1.00 | |||
EC200 | −0.57* | −0.82** | −0.83** | −0.64* | −0.89* | −0.71** | −0.77** | −0.88** | −0.89** | 0.85** | 0.93** | 1.00 | ||
CHL100 | 0.69** | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.66* | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.12 | −0.09 | 1.00 | |
CHL150 | 0.57 | 0.82** | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.77** | 0.56 | 0.76** | 0.78** | 0.74** | −0.82** | −0.78 | −0.72 | 0.20 | 1.00 |
CHL200 | 0.62* | 0.71** | 0.67* | 0.44 | 0.69** | 0.62* | 0.44 | 0.75** | 0.79** | −0.73** | −0.68 | −0.79 | 0.13 | 0.41 |
For each parameter, average values of three AtDREB1A transgenic peanut lines along with WT were used. The letters indicate the parameters followed by concentration of NaCl followed by days of exposure to NaCl (e.g. PRO 100, Proline content at 100mM NaCl) (Refer to Table 1).