Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 29;9(12):e115802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115802

Figure 8. Sieving curve for visualization of different pore size by using different molecular weight dextrans, ranking between 10Inline graphic and 10Inline graphic g/mol.

Figure 8

RC and xRC exhibit a narrower rejection range than the other membranes and, therefore, a more homogeneous pore size distribution. Two commercially available RC cassette are compared against showing tighter pore sizes even for the membrane rated as 1000 kDa. GE HF 750 kDa (PES HF 7) exhibits the largest cut-off and wider pore size distribution. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article) PES based cassettes and HF both outperform the xRC and RC based cassettes.