Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 29;9(12):e116327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116327

Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies for the risk of prostate cancer analysis.

Author publication year Country/region Study design Study period(years) Male subjects PCa cases Treatment comparison Measure of outcome Adjustments* Study quality score
Currie et al., 2009 UK retrospective cohort study 2.4 (2000–2003) 32261 301 metformin vs Sulfonylureas; metformin vs Insulin-based therapies aHR 1–3 7
Ferrara et al., 2011 USA retrospective cohort study 8 (1997–2005) 134864 2105 metformin vs pioglitazone aHR 1,2,5,9,13,15 5
Azoulay et al., 2011 Canada nested case–control study 21(1988–2009) 8098 739 Metformin vs other hypoglycemic agent aRR 2,3,5,6,9,12,16 7
Murtola et al., 2008 Finland Case-Control Study 7(1995–2002) 49446 24723 Metformin user vs nonuser aOR 1,4,16 6
Wright et al.,2009 USA Case-Control Study 3(2002–2005) 1943 1001 Metformin user vs nonuser aOR 1,5–8,16 6
Hsieh et al.,2012 Taiwan retrospective cohort study 8(2000–2008) 5680 84 metformin vs Insulin; metformin vs Sulfonylureas aOR 1 6
Onitilo et al.,2013 USA retrospective cohort study 14(1995–2009) 4956 237 Metformin vs other hypoglycemic agent aHR 1,2,4,6,10,14,15 6
Ruiter et al.,2012 Netherlands retrospective cohort study 10(1998–2008) 40131 236 metfromin vs Sulfonylurea derivatives aHR 1,5,10 8
Morden et al.,2011 USA Retrospective cohort study 5(2003–2008) 25660 2072 metformin vs insulin aHR 1,2,6,10,13,15 5
Margel et al.,2013 Canada nested case–control study 15(1994–2009) 31836 5306 Metformin vs other hypoglycemic agent aOR 4–6,10,15,16 7
Tseng,2011 Taiwan retrospective cohort study 2(2003–2005) 494630 889 Metformin user vs nonuser aHR 1,4–6,10,15,16 5
Preston et al.,2014 Denmark nested case–control study 22(1989–2011) 134486 12226 Metformin user vs nonuser aOR 10,16 8

*Adjustments: 1.Age, 2.smoking status, 3.prior cancer diagnosis, 4.place of residency, 5.use of other diabetes medications, 6.BMI, 7.PSA value, 8.family history of prostate cancer, 9.HbA1c, 10.Comorbidities, 11.Townsend index of deprivation, 12.excessive alcohol use, 13.race/ethnicity, 14.year of diagnosis, 15.socioeconomic status, 16.other drug use, 17.ADT treatment, 18.T stage, 19.Gleason score, 20.primary treatment with radiation or surgery, 21.surgical margin, 22.lymph node metastasis, 23. extracapsular extension, 24. seminal vesicle invasion.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure