Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 6;4(4):980–993. doi: 10.3390/biom4040980

Table 4.

Inhibition of human LDL oxidation in vitro in relation to the concentration of the test compounds.

Compound % Inhibition (Relative to the Control)
Cu2+-Induction AAPH Derived Peroxyl Radical–Induction
Concentration (µmol·L−1) Concentration (µmol·L−1)
1 10 100 500 1 10 100 500
Q3G 7 ± 4.5c 20 ± 9.2bc 20 ± 1.8bc 33 ± 8.6ab 10 ± 2.6C 10 ± 2.7C 16 ± 7.2C 29 ± 2.0C
Q3G stearate 4 ± 9.4c 14 ± 7.5bc 21 ± 8.6bc 29 ± 4.2b 4 ± 5.9C 11 ± 5.0C 14 ± 7.5C 27 ± 8.5C
Q3G oleate 8 ± 7.4c 18 ± 5.8bc 14 ± 5.3bc 28 ± 2.8bc 12 ± 7.2C 9 ± 2.8C 15 ± 3.9C 17 ± 13.6C
Q3G linoleate 14 ± 3.4bc 27 ± 7.8bc 29 ± 5.9b 34 ± 6.3ab 5 ± 4.7C 15 ± 7.8C 23 ± 5.6C 25 ± 5.4C
Q3G α-linolenate 40 ± 5.6ab 34 ± 5.1ab 31 ± 2.9ab 31 ± 3.5ab 28 ± 9.5AB 23 ± 4.3AB 23 ± 2.0AB 34 ± 6.3AB
Q3G eicosapentaenoate 20 ± 8.8bc 43 ± 6.8ab 45 ± 3.1ab 51 ± 2.6a 21 ± 3.8A 36 ± 6.7A 38 ± 1.7A 41 ± 2.9A
Q3G docosahexaenoate 7 ± 5.5c 14 ± 7.9bc 27 ± 6.7bc 43 ± 1.4ab 13 ± 3.7BC 9 ± 8.1BC 30 ± 10.0BC 27 ± 8.1BC

Data from Cu2+- and peroxyl radical-induced LDL oxidation were statistically analyzed separately and presented as means ± standard deviation. Different letters (a,b,c… and A,B,C…) denote significant differences among test compounds and concentrations, for % inhibition of Cu2+- and peroxy radical- induced oxidation, respectively (p ≤ 0.05).