Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 3;5:3955. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4955

Table 3. Data selection.

Condition Selection 2010 only No z cut NR NL zR(mm) zL(mm) zΔ(mm)
No bias Disjoint   39 1.7±10
Well alternated Disjoint   11 13 −22.3±22.3 −1.8±20.3 −10.2±15.1
Well alternated Disjoint 14 14 −13.9±28.8 −17.5±24.5 −1.8±18.9
Hold times≤0.4 s Disjoint   11 70 −22.3±22.3 −1.6±8.5 −10.3±11.9
All hold times Sub/Super   38 220 −18.3±10.3 −0.1±4.6 −9.1±5.6
All hold times Sub/Super 42 229 −12.0±12.5 −1.4±5.0 −5.3±6.7
Hold times≥10 s Sub     94 25 9.8±6.8 −5.1±11.5 7.5±6.7
Principle     241 145 7.9±4.2 −0.2±5.3 4.1±3.4
Hold times>0.4 s Super     279 150 5.5±4.1 0.7±5.5 2.4±3.4
All hold times Super     290 220 4.4±4.0 −0.1±4.6 2.2±3.1
All hold times Super   310 229 2.8±4.2 −1.4±5.0 2.1±3.2

Different data sets as described in the condition column; the principle row is the data set principally analysed in this article. It is the only row to include the antiproton-suppressing elliptical cut. The No Bias row reports data taken with the bias electric fields off. The ‘Well alternated’ rows come from trapping trials in which the Bias-Right and Bias-Left conditions were strictly alternated. As not every trial trapped antiatoms, the data are not strictly alternated. The selection column indicates if the row’s data set is a subset, superset or disjoint set relative to the principle data set. Some of the rows include both a subset of the principle data and some additional data; these rows are designated Sub/Super. All rows include the |z|<136 mm cut unless otherwise noted.