Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan 24;59(6):1607–1614. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.11.096

Table.

Characteristics of included studies

Author Year Design No. Age,
years
Male,
%
Indication,
% CLIa
Lesion
location, % femoropoplitealb
Intervention,
% stentc
Comparisond Cointerventiond Mean
follow-up,
months
Soga 2011 Retrospective cohort 618 72 ± 11 69% 100% 35% 37% No cilostazol Aspirin, dopidogrel 21
Soga 2012 Retrospective cohort 562 73 ± 9 76% 26% 100% 100% No cilostazol Aspirin, clopidogrel 25
Ikushima 2011 Retrospective cohort 28 76 ± 7 82% 36% 100% 100% Tidopidine Aspirin 18
Iishi 2010 Retrospective cohort 109 65 ± 11 64% 21% 100% 65% No cilostazol Aspirin 37
Soga 2009 RCT 78 71 ± 8 83% 0% 100% 46% No cilostazol Aspirin, tidopidine 24
Iida 2008 RCT 127 70 ± 8 72% 25% 100% 87% Tidopidine Aspirin 36

CLI, Critical limb ischemia; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

a

Indications included critical limb ischemia vs claudication.

b

Lesion locations include femoropopliteal and infrapoplitcal.

c

Interventions include stenting (with or without angioplasry) and angioplasty alone.

d

Aspirin dose, 81–200 mg/day; ticlopidine dose, 200 mg/day; clopidogrel dose, 75 mg/day.