Outcome measure | Evidence | Implication |
---|---|---|
Disease-oriented evidence | – Sipuleucel-T leads to recruitment of T-cells to the tumor. –Sipuleucel-T may increase PSA doubling time. |
– Basic mechanism of action. |
Patient-oriented evidence | – Sipuleucel-T increases overall survival in patients with mCRPC. –Sipuleucel-T does not decrease tumor size or prolong time to progression. –Sipuleucel-T may prolong time to use of opiate pain medications. |
– Very important outcome and led to approval of this agent. – Important because it should not be used in someone with rapidly progressing mCRPC. –Very preliminary finding, but could suggest some delayed effect on the disease. |
Economic evidence | – A single analysis using the cost of sipuleucel-T in US dollars ($140,536) and a gain of 0.37 quality-adjusted life years determined that there was 96.5% certainty it was not cost-effective. | – The current cost to outcomes ratio seen in the IMPACT study does not support the use of sipuleucel-T. If the price goes down, or the improvement in survival goes up, this may be adjusted. |