Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e74132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074132

Table 2. Likelihood parameter estimates under site-specific models of Hh vertebrate paralogs, branch calculated with PAML v4.3 [51].

Gene Model Parameters Lnl Models Compared LRT (2Δl) p-value df
Dhh M0 ω0 = 0.08479 −7360.011 M0 vs M3* 190.185 0.000 4
M3 ω0 = 0.00492 ω1 = 0.08337 ω2 = 0.31612 −7162.160
p0 = 0.39785 p1 = 0.34084 p2 = 0.26131
M7 p = 0.41513 q = 3.11107 −7163.063 M7* vs M8 0.006 0.997 2
ω = 0.114
M8 p0 = 0.99999 p = 0.41486 q = 3.10767 −7163.066
(p1 = 0.00001) ω1 = 2.90725
Ihh M0 ω0 = 0.06236 −8206.454 M0 vs M3* 740.516 0.000 4
M3 ω0 = 0.00520 ω1 = 0.11825 ω2 = 0.34903 −7836.196
p0 = 0.59836 p1 = 0.27289 p2 = 0.12874
M7 p = 0.25686 q = 2.77341 −7838.824 M7* vs M8 0.002 0.999
ω = 0.080
M8 p0 = 0.99999 p = 0.25687 q = 2.77361 −7838.825
(p1 = 0.00001) ω1 = 1.00000
Shh M0 ω0 = 0.04658 −7648.861 M0 vs M3* 612.130 0.000 4
M3 ω0 = 0.00188 ω1 = 0.06952 ω2 = 0.26493 −7342.796
p0 = 0.60204 p1 = 0.25287 p2 = 0.14509
M7 p = 0.20836 q = 3.15101 −7342.669 M7* vs M8 0.007 0.996 2
ω = 0.058
M8 p0 = 0.99999 p = 0.20836 q = 3.15102 −7342.672
(p1 = 0.00001) ω1 = 5.18630

An asterisk (*) marks the accepted model.