Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e115875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115875

Figure 2. Comparison of worm distribution patterns for a negative binomial-based MWB system vs. a SWB system.

Figure 2

Here, all SWB distributions (right-hand panels) are produced from an uninfected source Inline graphic. (a) NB-MWB with fixed mean Inline graphic and increasing k (Inline graphic is the limiting Poisson case); (b) Equilibrium SWB distribution for uninfected source with FOI (mean) Inline graphic, and varying demographic parameter Inline graphic (see equation (13)); Inline graphic plays the role of aggregation k for NB, with small Inline graphic corresponding to large (infinite) k. Panels (c−d) Poisson distributions with different means, Inline graphic (left panel) vs. SWB distributions with different Inline graphic (right panel) exhibit striking similarity. Panels (e)−(f) compare infectious prevalence Inline graphic for the two models as a function of NB-MWB w or SWB Inline graphic.