Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e115875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115875

Figure 5. Effect of SWB inputs (the Inline graphic increment, and the mating hurdle q) on predicted outputs.

Figure 5

Left-hand panels show the distribution of mated pairs in host strata, and right-hand panels show the force of snail infection Inline graphic. The three plots in each column correspond to different choices of q. Column (a) compares mated fraction Inline graphic of equation (20) for fine-grain system Inline graphic (gray line) vs. coarse-grained Inline graphic (black dots). Step Inline graphic has only a minor effect on fraction Inline graphic (i.e., low sensitivity), but the force of infection Inline graphic (column (b)) shows more sensitivity to Inline graphic (higher Inline graphic predicts stronger force, particularly at low Inline graphic). Overall, the mating effect on Inline graphic is significant - all curves in (b) depart from the simple linear relation Inline graphic (the thin, straight line), and increased hurdle factor q also has a significant effect in lowering Λ.