Table 6. Results of PLSR models for TNCs-HSI analysis based on full spectra (F-PLSR) and the selected important wavelengths (RF-PLSR).
Samples | Models | N.[1] | LVs | Calibration | Cross-Validation | Prediction | |||
RC | RMSEC (%) | RCV | RMSECV (%) | RP | RMSEP (%) | ||||
Leaf | F-PLSR[5] | 460 | 17 | 0.974 | 0.156 | 0.924 | 0.269 | 0.934 | 0.223 |
RF-PLSR[6] | 10 | 3 | 0.817 | 0.401 | 0.798 | 0.420 | 0.828 | 0.356 | |
Stem | F-PLSR | 460 | 16 | 0.987 | 0.063 | 0.917 | 0.168 | 0.930 | 0.084 |
RF-PLSR | 9 | 5 | 0.820 | 0.229 | 0.773 | 0.254 | 0.724 | 0.157 | |
Root | F-PLSR | 460 | 11 | 0.992 | 0.020 | 0.931 | 0.064 | 0.915 | 0.045 |
RF-PLSR | 7 | 7 | 0.773 | 0.097 | 0.592 | 0.130 | 0.797 | 0.068 | |
Whole-plant | F-PLSR | 460 | 6 | 0.904 | 0.388 | 0.893 | 0.409 | 0.908 | 0.351 |
RF-PLSR | 8 | 4 | 0.878 | 0.451 | 0.874 | 0.468 | 0.876 | 0.426 |
Note:
N.: Number of wavelengths used for analysis;
F-PLSR models meant the PLSR models established by using full spectra;
RF-PLSR models represented the PLSR models built by important wavelengths selected by RF algorithm. LVs, RC, RMSEC, RCV, RMSECV, RP, and RMSEP could be found in the text.