Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e116205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116205

Table 6. Results of PLSR models for TNCs-HSI analysis based on full spectra (F-PLSR) and the selected important wavelengths (RF-PLSR).

Samples Models N.[1] LVs Calibration Cross-Validation Prediction
RC RMSEC (%) RCV RMSECV (%) RP RMSEP (%)
Leaf F-PLSR[5] 460 17 0.974 0.156 0.924 0.269 0.934 0.223
RF-PLSR[6] 10 3 0.817 0.401 0.798 0.420 0.828 0.356
Stem F-PLSR 460 16 0.987 0.063 0.917 0.168 0.930 0.084
RF-PLSR 9 5 0.820 0.229 0.773 0.254 0.724 0.157
Root F-PLSR 460 11 0.992 0.020 0.931 0.064 0.915 0.045
RF-PLSR 7 7 0.773 0.097 0.592 0.130 0.797 0.068
Whole-plant F-PLSR 460 6 0.904 0.388 0.893 0.409 0.908 0.351
RF-PLSR 8 4 0.878 0.451 0.874 0.468 0.876 0.426

Note:

[1]

N.: Number of wavelengths used for analysis;

[5]

F-PLSR models meant the PLSR models established by using full spectra;

[6]

RF-PLSR models represented the PLSR models built by important wavelengths selected by RF algorithm. LVs, RC, RMSEC, RCV, RMSECV, RP, and RMSEP could be found in the text.