Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Apr;9(2):24–40. doi: 10.1525/jer.2014.9.2.24

TABLE 3.

Summary of Training Program Attributes.

PROGRAM ATTRIBUTES FABTP IRETP UTMBIS IRENSA SARETI WABTP SBCJH TSRE IU–Moi AREP
Was program single or multiple institution (only counting institutions core to the program)? Single, later Multi Multi Single Single Multi for first two cycles. Single in third cycle Single Multi Multi Multi
Were any of the training components external to parent institution? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Language of teaching in program? English English English English English English English and French English English
Did some students struggle with the language of teaching? No No A few No One No A few A few had problems with grad courses No
Were indigenous and/or cultural values embedded in the curriculum? Case studies and readings Seminar discussions Embedded in modules Embedded in modules Two modules on culture and morality Lectures on culture, projects on cultural issues Modules on religion and culture Embedded in curriculum and cases Orientation lectures and readings on culture and required course for IU-based students
Did program offer distance learning (e-learning)? Yes No
Were any significant changes made to program (including curriculum) during the funding cycles? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
During first cycle Reading list and modular structure Funded enrollment in MPH offered as option
After first cycle Added additional required courses Intro of new module on pub health Developed MPH with specialty in bioethics; added Madagascar as new site; added new Belgian univ as partner Revised practicum criteria, intro two 3-wk courses, broadened the scope of workshops
After second cycle Switched from individual to inst focus Yes
Other program requirements Prac proposal + impl. plan Short written assignment after 1st module Trainees required to take bioethics unit, activities such as workshops, lectures, rec membership
Did the students receive a reentry grant on return to home institution? Yes Some students Yes
Structured Mentoring Yes Yes For a few Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Unstructured Mentoring Yes Yes For majority Yes Yes