Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2014 Aug 5;61:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.015

Table 2.

Repeated measures regression analyses of the relation between alliance and both prior and subsequent symptom change.

Predictor (s) Dependent variable Model Parameter estimate (b) Standard Error (SE) t-value p-value
Alliance Subsequent symptom change 1: Basic Model −.08 .03 −2.69 .008

Prior symptom change Subsequent symptom change 2: Covarying Prior CES-D Change & Expectancies .59 .17 3.56 .001
Expectancies −.17 .08 −2.14 .035
Alliance −.05 .03 −1.71 .090

Prior symptom change Alliance 3: Basic Model .49 .12 4.10 .000

Expectancies Alliance 4: Covarying Expectancies .60 .17 3.58 .001
Prior symptom change .45 .12 3.78 .000

Note: Alliance = Working Alliance Inventory; Subsequent symptom change = A vector of lagged CES-D scores (i.e., CES-D at the timepoint subsequent to the alliance assessment), with CES-D scores at the previous timepoint (T-1) entered as a covariate. Prior symptom change = CES-D symptom change prior to alliance assessment. Degrees of freedom (df) for model 1 (df = 106), model 2 (df = 104) and model 3 (df = 222) and model 4 (df = 222). Unstandardized estimates (b), standard errors (SE) and both t-values and p-values are provided. In models 1 and 2, negative t values reflect a predictor variable being related to larger improvements in symptom scores. In models 3 and 4, positive t values reflect a predictor variable being associated with higher alliance scores.