Table 4.

Correlations Between Priority Scores and Words in LIWC Categories in Critiques of R01 Applications from Experienced Male and Female Investigators, from a Text Analysis Study of 454 Critiques, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Fiscal Year 2008–2009^a

Variable	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1 Priority scores	--	−.417^b	.008	−.406^b	.290 ^b	−.199^c	−.071	−.425^b
2 Ability	−.061	--	.073	.575^b	−.336^b	.072	−.041	.395^b
3 Achievement	−.070	.075	--	.161	−.005	.300^b	−.066	.078
4 Agentic	−.089	.430^b	.293^b	--	−.130	.275^b	−.063	.386^b
5 Negative	.020	.052	.083	.074	--	−.087	.171	−.346^b
6 Positive	−.112	−.007	.204^b	−.014	−.003	--	.024	.176
7 Research	.101	.076	.173^b	.167^b	−.013	.101	--	.022
8 Standout	−.110	−.017	.030	.051	.330^b	−.119	−.038	--

Abbreviations: LIWC = Linguistic Inquiry Word Count text analysis software program.

Correlations between experienced female investigators’ scores and word categories in critiques are above the diagonal; experienced male investigators’ are shown below.

Correlation is significant, P < .01.

Correlation is significant, P < .05.