Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 8;111(51):18243–18248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420914111

Table 1.

Fitting results of native states by single- (Eq. 1) and double-exponential (Eqs. 2 and 3) kinetics

Fitting results
Two-state model Three-state model Experimental data§
Name C0 λ0*, ×103 ns−1 χ2, ×102 C1 m1 C2 m2 λ1 (sim), ns1 λ2 (sim), ns1 χ2, ×102 λ1 (exp), μs1 λ2 (exp), μs1
Wild type 0.67 0.43 2.4 0.72 0.11 0.15 0.57 0.085 0.00032 1.4 0.030(1)# <0.0011
Y11R 0.80 3.0 1.8 0.80 0.12 0.10 1.97 0.040 0.0026 1.3 0.025(4) <0.0014
Y19L 0.018 6.2 0.23 0.019 0.79 0.57 0.35 0.24 0.00041 0.65 0.035(2) <0.0021
W30F 0.16 1.3 0.84 0.31 0.26 0.68 0.33 0.36 0.00012 1.8 0.054(2)
ΔNY11R 0.37 2.8 2.2 0.37 0.05 0.24 0.81 0.76 0.0025 2.0 0.026(3) <0.0016
ΔNΔCY11R 0.33 3.2 1.8 0.33 0.17 0.37 0.51 0.061 0.0025 1.7 0.050(2)
ΔNΔCY11R/L26A 0.46 2.2 2.0 0.47 0.14 0.29 0.55 0.039 0.0019 1.7 0.044(1) <0.0020
*

λ0 of Eq. 1.

Sum of squares of SI Appendix, Eq. S24, divided by the number of degrees of freedom.

λ1 (sim) and λ2 (sim) of Eqs. 2 and 3.

§

Ref. 15.

λ1 (exp) and λ2 (exp) are the same as k1 and k2 in ref. 15.

#

SDs are in parentheses.