. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Multivariate Behav Res. 2014 Nov;49(6):581–596. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.947352

Table 7.

Percentile rank of real data fit among the simulated data fit

Example	RMSEA	1–CFI	1–TLI	SRMR
H&S_M1	99.3 (0.059) ^	99.1 (0.027) ^	99.1 (0.043) ^	89.7 (0.045) +^
H&S_M2	98.6 (0.059) ^	98.0 (0.027) ^	98.0 (0.043) ^	94.0 (0.045) ^
WAIS-R	29.6 (0.043) +	28.0 (0.002) +	28.0 (0.004) +	7.4 (0.02) +
COERCE_full	100 (0.101) ^	100 (0.186) ^	100 (0.261) ^	100 (0.063) ^
COERCE_sub	96.1 (0.117) ^	98.1 (0.207) ^	98.1 (0.289) ^	99.4 (0.075) ^

Values in parentheses indicate the real data fit values. Applying a rule of the percentile rank being over 90% meaning poor fit and otherwise meaning adequate fit, + indicates the fit was adequate, ^ indicates the fit was poor and having both + and ^ indicates the fit was marginal.