Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 10;37(5):421–434. doi: 10.1111/jvp.12117

Table 3.

Excretion balance after oral and intravenous dosing

Time interval [h] Urine + Cage wash Feces Total
Fraction excreted in males mean [% of oral dose] (CV [%])
0–8* 0.58 (n < 3) (no feces) 0.58 (n < 3)
0–24 16.70 (20.9) 34.41 (92.2) 51.11 (66.2)
0–48 21.86 (20.5) 75.65 (12.3) 97.51 (6.4)
0–264 26.74 (27.6) 78.01 (10.8) 104.74 (2.8)
Fraction excreted in females mean [% of oral dose] (CV [%])
 0–8* 7.95 (n < 3) 0.09 (n < 3) 8.04 (n < 3)
 0–24* 22.96 (n < 3) 40.62 (n < 3) 63.58 (n < 3)
 0–48 30.88 (23.3) 45.64 (22.0) 76.52 (20.8)
 0–264 38.20 (25.4) 55.64 (8.4) 93.84 (8.4)
Fraction excreted in females mean [% of intravenous dose] (CV [%])
 0–8* 30.62 (n < 3) (no feces) 30.62 (n < 3)
 0–24* 37.58 (19.1) 54.74 (n < 3) 74.07 (33.4)
 0–48* 39.87 (19.9) 68.33 (n < 3) 85.43 (37.2)
 0–264 41.52 (21.8) 62.91 (21.3) 104.43 (4.4)
[14C]Absorptionurine [mean%] (CV [%]: 91.92 (15.5)

Excretion of [14C] imepitoin in three male and three female dogs after oral dosing of 20 mg/kg filled in gelatin capsules, 0.792 MBq/kg, and i.v. dosing of 1 mg/kg dissolved in 70% DMSO in saline, 0.792 MBq/kg, to three female dogs. Displayed are cumulative excretion data in% excretion of total administered dose, given as mean and coefficient of variance (CV). In some intervals, samples were not obtained from all three dogs, and therefore, no CV could be calculated (indicated by *).

The total enteral [14C] absorption in% of administered dose was approximated from comparison of renally excreted fractions of the administered [14C] dose following oral and intravenous administration in female dogs in crossover design.