Table 3.
Cell surface expression (% WT) | Ca2+i mobilization | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 modulator | 0.3 μM | 3 μM | pKB ± SEM (n) | Logαβ ± SEM (αβ) | |
Cinacalcet | 12 ± 2 | 74 ± 12 | 152 ± 39 | 6.00 ± 0.19 (7)a | 0.59 ± 0.06 (3.9)a |
NPS-R568 | 33 ± 9 | 126 ± 37 | 6.61 ± 0.14 (4) | 0.74 ± 0.14 (5.5) | |
Calindol | 36 ± 7 | 112 ± 28 | 6.33 ± 0.31 (3) | 0.53 ± 0.10 (3.4) | |
R,R-calcimimetic B | 62 ± 11 | 152 ± 40 | 5.27 ± 0.37 (4) | 0.51 ± 0.12 (3.2) | |
S,R-calcimimetic B | 12 ± 3 | 14 ± 5 | Not performed | Not performed | |
nor-calcimimetic B | 28 ± 6 | 91 ± 27 | 6.21 ± 0.23 (3) | 0.42 ± 0.06 (2.6) | |
AC-265347 | 14 ± 3 | 18 ± 5 | 6.62 ± 0.23 (3) | 0.72 ± 0.10 (5.2) |
Cell surface expression of the mutant following overnight treatment with modulator was determined by FACS analysis. The potency of Ca2+o in Ca2+i mobilization assays in the presence of increasing concentrations of modulator was fitted to an allosteric ternary complex model (Equation 2013a) to quantify the equilibrium dissociation constant (pKB) and cooperativity (αβ) of the modulators at the G670E mutant.
Datasets taken from those used in (Leach et al., 2013).