. 2014 Dec 30;4(12):e006093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006093

Table 4.

Unadjusted and adjusted social cognitive theory constructs and condom used at last sex act among participants in the safe in the city study behavioural assessment

Social cognitive theory constructs	Percentage of condom use at last sex act		Unadjusted RR	Confidence levels		Adjusted† RR	Confidence levels
1. Self-efficacy with most recent partner	0	17	2.72	2.13	3.48***	2.56	2.01	3.27***
1. Self-efficacy with most recent partner	1	47	2.72	2.13	3.48***	2.56	2.01	3.27***
2. Self-control self-efficacy	0	26	1.72	1.41	2.10***	1.67	1.37	2.04***
2. Self-control self-efficacy	1	44	1.72	1.41	2.10***	1.67	1.37	2.04***
3. Sexual self-efficacy	0	29	1.45	1.18	1.78***	1.50	1.23	1.84***
3. Sexual self-efficacy	1	42	1.45	1.18	1.78***	1.50	1.23	1.84***
4. Hedonistic outcome expectancies	0	27	1.73	1.46	2.06***	1.83	1.54	2.17***
4. Hedonistic outcome expectancies	1	46	1.73	1.46	2.06***	1.83	1.54	2.17***
5. Partner expected outcomes	0	4	11.04	3.63	33.56***	9.74	3.21	29.57***
5. Partner expected outcomes	1	42	11.04	3.63	33.56***	9.74	3.21	29.57***
6. Risk perception	0	44	0.84	0.73	0.97*	0.88	0.76	1.02
6. Risk perception	1	37	0.84	0.73	0.97*	0.88	0.76	1.02

*p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001.

†Adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics: study arm, study site, age, race, gender, marital status, sexual orientation and education.

RR, relative risk.