Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 13;22(6):522–527. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2014.02.013

Table 2.

Assessment of patient identification handwritten prescription completeness.

Different variables MOPD (n = 99)
PCC (n = 67)
SOPD (n = 32)
Completeness
Incompleteness
Completeness
Incompleteness
Completeness
Incompleteness
N % N % N % N % N % N %
Prescription number 99 100 0 0 67 100 0 0 32 0 0 0
Patient name 99 100 0 0 67 100 0 0 32 0 0 0
Hospital number 99 100 0 0 67 100 0 0 32 0 0 0
Gender 57 57.57 42 42.42 49 73.13 18 26.86 28 87.5 4 12.5
Age 39 39.39 60 60.60 12 17.91 55 82.08 15 46.87 17 53.12
Diagnosis 88 88.88 11 11.11 45 67.16 22 32.83 26 81.25 6 18.75
Totala 481 80.97 113 19.02 307 76.36 95 23.63 165 85.93 27 14.06
a

Frequencies and percentages were calculated from the total number of handwritten prescription completeness.